Compressive wireless sensing

Compressive sampling is an emerging theory that is based on the fact that a relatively small number of random projections of a signal can contain most of its salient information. In this paper, we introduce the concept of compressive wireless sensing for sensor networks in which a fusion center retrieves signal field information from an ensemble of spatially distributed sensor nodes. Energy and bandwidth are scarce resources in sensor networks and the relevant metrics of interest in our context are 1) the latency involved in information retrieval; and 2) the associated power-distortion trade-off. It is generally recognized that given sufficient prior knowledge about the sensed data (e.g., statistical characterization, homogeneity etc.), there exist schemes that have very favorable power-distortion-latency trade-offs. We propose a distributed matched source-channel communication scheme, based in part on recent results in compressive sampling theory, for estimation of sensed data at the fusion center and analyze, as a function of number of sensor nodes, the trade-offs between power, distortion and latency. Compressive wireless sensing is a universal scheme in the sense that it requires no prior knowledge about the sensed data. This universality, however, comes at the cost of optimality (in terms of a less favorable power-distortion-latency trade-off) and we quantify this cost relative to the case when sufficient prior information about the sensed data is assumed

[1]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Signal Reconstruction From Noisy Random Projections , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Distributed compression in a dense microsensor network , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[3]  Raghuraman Mudumbai,et al.  Scalable feedback control for distributed beamforming in sensor networks , 2005, Proceedings. International Symposium on Information Theory, 2005. ISIT 2005..

[4]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  R. Jackson Inequalities , 2007, Algebra for Parents.

[6]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Matched source-channel communication for field estimation in wireless sensor network , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[7]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Source-Channel Communication in Sensor Networks , 2003, IPSN.

[8]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Power, spatio-temporal bandwidth, and distortion in large sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[9]  Urbashi Mitra,et al.  Estimating inhomogeneous fields using wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[10]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  On the Many-to-One Transport Capacity of a Dense Wireless Sensor Network and the Compressibility of Its Data , 2003, IPSN.

[11]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Distributed Sampling for Dense Sensor Networks: A "Bit-Conservation Principle" , 2003, IPSN.

[12]  Akbar M. Sayeed,et al.  Optimal Distributed Detection Strategies for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[13]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  Sergio D. Servetto On the Feasibility of Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks , 2002 .

[15]  M. Vetterli,et al.  Power-bandwidth-distortion scaling laws for sensor networks , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.