As a collaborative effort between scientists affiliated with the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and the European reference center for breast cancer screening and diagnosis (EUREF), the Working Group on Phantoms for Breast Imaging (WGPBI) aims to develop phantoms and evaluation techniques for 2D & 3D breast imaging modalities. In the first phase of this collaboration, this project aimed to develop a phantom and associated procedure for constancy testing of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems. The procedure involves daily and weekly components. The daily evaluation is performed on a simple, homogenous PMMA plate of 4 cm thickness. For the weekly part, a new phantom has been designed consisting of a 45 mm thick homogeneous slab of PMMA with a set of spherical and rectangular inserts at specific 3D positions, and a thin wire positioned at a small angle to the plane of the detector. Quality control parameters are extracted from both projection images (if available) and reconstructed planes. The homogeneous phantom for daily QC allows a trend analysis of homogeneity and the assessment of detector artifacts. With the proposed phantom concept for weekly QC, the stability of the following parameters can be evaluated: the propagation and correlation of the noise in plane and across the reconstructed tomographic planes, lag, signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR), the geometry and the motion, effective thickness of the reconstructed planes, homogeneity, distance accuracy, frequency dependent SNR, and artifacts. Analysis of the DICOM header provides information on the stability of the automatic exposure control (AEC), exposure settings, and several system parameters. In an on-going study, the proposed strategy is being applied to five tomosynthesis systems both in Europe and in the US. In this paper we report on the specifics of the phantom, the QC procedure, the practicalities of remote data analysis, and the results of the initial trial.
[1]
Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.
A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
,
2006,
Medical physics.
[2]
E Shaheen,et al.
Simulation of 3D objects into breast tomosynthesis images.
,
2010,
Radiation protection dosimetry.
[3]
Michael J. Flynn,et al.
Measurement of the spatial resolution of a clinical volumetric computed tomography scanner using a sphere phantom
,
2006,
SPIE Medical Imaging.
[4]
Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.
Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.
,
2008,
Medical physics.
[5]
Hilde Bosmans,et al.
One Year of Experience with Remote Quality Assurance of Digital Mammography Systems in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Program
,
2008,
Digital Mammography / IWDM.
[6]
Ehsan Samei,et al.
Use of Wiener filtering in the measurement of the two-dimensional modulation transfer function
,
2000,
Medical Imaging.
[7]
Baojun Li,et al.
Optimization of slice sensitivity profile for radiographic tomosynthesis.
,
2007,
Medical physics.
[8]
Kenneth C. Young,et al.
Image Quality Measurements in Breast Tomosynthesis
,
2008,
Digital Mammography / IWDM.