Concurrent Sound Segregation Is Enhanced in Musicians

The ability to segregate simultaneously occurring sounds is fundamental to auditory perception. Many studies have shown that musicians have enhanced auditory perceptual abilities; however, the impact of musical expertise on segregating concurrently occurring sounds is unknown. Therefore, we examined whether long-term musical training can improve listeners' ability to segregate sounds that occur simultaneously. Participants were presented with complex sounds that had either all harmonics in tune or the second harmonic mistuned by 1%, 2%, 4%, 8%, or 16% of its original value. The likelihood of hearing two sounds simultaneously increased with mistuning, and this effect was greater in musicians than nonmusicians. The segregation of the mistuned harmonic from the harmonic series was paralleled by an object-related negativity that was larger and peaked earlier in musicians. It also coincided with a late positive wave referred to as the P400 whose amplitude was larger in musicians than in nonmusicians. The behavioral and electrophysiological effects of musical expertise were specific to processing the mistuned harmonic as the N1, the N1c, and the P2 waves elicited by the tuned stimuli were comparable in both musicians and nonmusicians. These results demonstrate that listeners' ability to segregate concurrent sounds based on harmonicity is modulated by experience and provides a basis for further studies assessing the potential rehabilitative effects of musical training on solving complex scene analysis problems illustrated by the cocktail party example.

[1]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Laurel J. Trainor,et al.  Automatic Encoding of Polyphonic Melodies in Musicians and Nonmusicians , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[4]  T. Picton,et al.  Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Antoine J. Shahin,et al.  Enhancement of Neuroplastic P2 and N1c Auditory Evoked Potentials in Musicians , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Claude Alain,et al.  Neural activity associated with distinguishing concurrent auditory objects. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B. Ross,et al.  COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGY: Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians , 2022 .

[8]  Claude Alain Breaking the wave: Effects of attention and learning on concurrent sound perception , 2007, Hearing Research.

[9]  R. Meddis,et al.  Time decay of auditory stream biasing , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Nicole M. Russo,et al.  Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Antoine J. Shahin,et al.  Modulation of P2 auditory-evoked responses by the spectral complexity of musical sounds , 2005, Neuroreport.

[12]  E. Hafter,et al.  Attending to auditory filters that were not stimulated directly. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[14]  E. Hafter,et al.  Listening bandwidths and frequency uncertainty in pure-tone signal detection. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  P. Berg,et al.  The correction of ocular artifacts: a topographic perspective , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  Donal G Sinex,et al.  Responses of auditory nerve fibers to harmonic and mistuned complex tones , 2003, Hearing Research.

[17]  Claude Alain,et al.  Effects of Attentional Load on Auditory Scene Analysis , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Schema-based processing in auditory scene analysis , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Musical Training Enhances Automatic Encoding of Melodic Contour and Interval Structure , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Claude Alain,et al.  Perceptual learning modulates sensory evoked response during vowel segregation. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  J. Snyder,et al.  Changes in auditory cortex parallel rapid perceptual learning. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  B. Moore,et al.  Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexes. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians , 1998, Nature.

[24]  K. Crowley,et al.  A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Besson,et al.  AN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL (ERP) STUDY OF MUSICAL EXPECTANCY : COMPARISON OF MUSICIANS WITH NONMUSICIANS , 1995 .

[26]  Daniel Reisberg,et al.  On the Perception of Interleaved Melodies , 1995 .

[27]  M Steinschneider,et al.  Consonance and dissonance of musical chords: neural correlates in auditory cortex of monkeys and humans. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[29]  M. Scherg,et al.  A Source Analysis of the Late Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  D. Sinex,et al.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones , 2002, Hearing Research.

[31]  J. Snyder,et al.  Age-related differences in auditory evoked responses during rapid perceptual learning , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  E. Altenmüller,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to sound omissions differ in musicians and non-musicians , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.