Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses.

We investigated attention allocation in a dual-task paradigm using behavioral and pupillary measures. We used an auditory digit span (DS) and a simple visual response time (RT) task. Participants were administered four conditions in which they performed neither task (no-task), a single task (DS or RT only), or both tasks (dual). Dependent variables were DS accuracy, RT, and task-evoked pupillary responses (TEPRs) to digits as estimates of mental effort. Participants maintained almost the same level of DS accuracy on dual as on DS only and sacrificed speed on the RT task. As expected, TEPRs increased linearly with memory load in both DS only and dual. Although TEPRs were initially higher in dual than in DS only, the slope of the increase was shallower in dual. Results suggest that TEPRs can elucidate mechanisms of attention allocation by distinguishing between effectiveness (level of behavioral performance) and efficiency (the costs of that performance in mental effort).

[1]  H. Gr.  Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework. , 1997 .

[2]  D. Navon,et al.  Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[4]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  The Pupillary Response in Cognitive Psychophysiology and Schizophrenia a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  J. Beatty.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982 .

[6]  J. Duncan,et al.  Separate and Shared Sources of Dual-Task Cost in Stimulus Identification and Response Selection , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Effects of Grouping on the Pupillary Response in a Short-Term Memory Task , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  P A Bourke.  Measuring Attentional Demand in Continuous Dual-task Performance , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  W. S. Peavler,et al.  Individual Differences in Pupil Size and Performance , 1974 .

[10]  W. Hirst,et al.  Characterizing attentional resources. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[12]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Autobiographical memory and executive function in early dementia of Alzheimer type , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  A. F. Sanders,et al.  A summary of resource theories from a behavioral perspective , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[14]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses index overload of working memory resources in schizophrenia. , 1997, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[16]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. , 1999 .