Obstacle Avoidance and a Perturbation Sensitivity Model for Motor Planning

A novel obstacle avoidance paradigm was used to investigate the planning of human reaching movements. We explored whether the CNS plans arm movements based entirely on the visual space kinematics of the movements, or whether the planning process incorporates specific details of the biomechanical plant to optimize the trajectory plan. Participants reached around an obstacle, the tip of which remained fixed in space throughout the experiment. When the obstacle and the start and target locations were rotated about the tip of the obstacle, the visually specified task constraints retained a rotational symmetry. If movements are planned in visual space, as indicated from a variety of studies on planar point-to-point movements, the resulting trajectories should also be rotationally symmetric across trials. However, systematic variations in movement path were observed as the orientation of the obstacle was changed. These path asymmetries can be accounted for by a class of models in which the planner reduces the likelihood of collision with the obstacle by taking into account the anisotropic sensitivity of the arm to external perturbations or uncertainty in joint level control or proprioception. The model that best matches the experimental results uses planning criteria based on the inertial properties of the arm.

[1]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[2]  G. J. Thomas The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements , 1967 .

[3]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  A. Gentile,et al.  Joint control strategies and hand trajectories in multijoint pointing movements. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  宇野 洋二,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement : minimum torque-change model , 1988 .

[11]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[12]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Trajectories of Human Multi-Joint Arm Movements: Evidence of Joint Level Planning , 1989, ISER.

[13]  吉川 恒夫,et al.  Foundations of robotics : analysis and control , 1990 .

[14]  David J. Bennett The Control of Human Arm Movement: Models and Mechanical Constraints , 1990 .

[15]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Arm Stiffness And Movement Adaptation To External Loads , 1991, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Volume 13: 1991.

[16]  Zachary M. Pine,et al.  Williams and Lissner??s Biomechanics of Human Motion , 1993 .

[17]  G E Loeb,et al.  The computation of position sense from spindles in mono- and multiarticular muscles , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Lackner,et al.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Turvey,et al.  Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the “muscular sense” , 1994, Neuroscience.

[21]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  M Desmurget,et al.  Postural and synergic control for three-dimensional movements of reaching and grasping. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Philip N. Sabes The planning of visually guided arm movements : feedback perturbation and obstacle avoidance studies , 1996 .

[24]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement , 1996, Science.