Network discovery via constrained tensor analysis of fMRI data

We pose the problem of network discovery which involves simplifying spatio-temporal data into cohesive regions (nodes) and relationships between those regions (edges). Such problems naturally exist in fMRI scans of human subjects. These scans consist of activations of thousands of voxels over time with the aim to simplify them into the underlying cognitive network being used. We propose supervised and semi-supervised variations of this problem and postulate a constrained tensor decomposition formulation and a corresponding alternating least squares solver that is easy to implement. We show this formulation works well in controlled experiments where supervision is incomplete, superfluous and noisy and is able to recover the underlying ground truth network. We then show that for real fMRI data our approach can reproduce well known results in neurology regarding the default mode network in resting-state healthy and Alzheimer affected individuals. Finally, we show that the reconstruction error of the decomposition provides a useful measure of the network strength and is useful at predicting key cognitive scores both by itself and with clinical information.

[1]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Classification of fMRI independent components using IC-fingerprints and support vector machine classifiers , 2007, NeuroImage.

[2]  A. Stegeman Comparing Independent Component Analysis and the Parafac model for artificial multi-subject fMRI data , 2007 .

[3]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Tensor Decompositions and Applications , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[4]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Recent developments in CANDECOMP/PARAFAC algorithms: a critical review , 2003 .

[6]  M. Greicius Resting-state functional connectivity in neuropsychiatric disorders , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[7]  Silke Dodel,et al.  Functional connectivity: studying nonlinear, delayed interactions between BOLD signals , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  Hamilton E. Link,et al.  Discrete dynamic Bayesian network analysis of fMRI data , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Dietmar Cordes,et al.  Hierarchical clustering to measure connectivity in fMRI resting-state data. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[11]  E. Formisano,et al.  Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Jing Li,et al.  Mining brain region connectivity for alzheimer's disease study via sparse inverse covariance estimation , 2009, KDD.

[14]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI , 2010, Science.

[16]  C. F. Beckmann,et al.  Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis , 2005, NeuroImage.

[17]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  TWave: High-order analysis of functional MRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  Ian Davidson,et al.  Flexible constrained spectral clustering , 2010, KDD.

[19]  Scott J Peltier,et al.  Detecting low‐frequency functional connectivity in fMRI using a self‐organizing map (SOM) algorithm , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Predicting Clinical Scores from Magnetic Resonance Scans in Alzheimer's Disease , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea , 2007, NeuroImage.

[22]  Piero Antuono,et al.  Prediction of cognitive decline in healthy older adults using fMRI. , 2010, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.