How to light up the night? The impact of city park lighting on visitors’ sense of safety and preferences

[1]  Seungnam Kim,et al.  Analysis of the relationship between nighttime illuminance and fear of crime using a quasi-controlled experiment with recorded virtual reality , 2023, Cities.

[2]  S. Sibilio,et al.  Urban Park Lighting Quality Perception: An Immersive Virtual Reality Experiment , 2023, Sustainability.

[3]  Weizeng Sun,et al.  Crime under the Light? Examining the Effects of Nighttime Lighting on Crime in China , 2022, Land.

[4]  A. Lis,et al.  How the amount of greenery in city parks impacts visitor preferences in the context of naturalness, legibility and perceived danger , 2022, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[5]  A. Lis,et al.  How vegetation impacts preference, mystery and danger in fortifications and parks in urban areas , 2022, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[6]  L. Maffei,et al.  An Investigation of the Influence of the Night Lighting in a Urban Park on Individuals’ Emotions , 2022, Sustainability.

[7]  A. Lis,et al.  The importance of seeking a win-win solution in shaping the vegetation of military heritage landscapes: The role of legibility, naturalness and user preference , 2022, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[8]  C. Kerbiriou,et al.  A plea for a worldwide development of dark infrastructure for biodiversity – Practical examples and ways to go forward , 2022, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[9]  Karolina M. Zielinska-Dabkowska,et al.  A Systematic Review for Establishing Relevant Environmental Parameters for Urban Lighting: Translating Research into Practice , 2022, Sustainability.

[10]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Research on Night Light Comfort of Pedestrian Space in Urban Park , 2021, Computational and mathematical methods in medicine.

[11]  Johan Rahm,et al.  Assessment of Outdoor Lighting: Methods for Capturing the Pedestrian Experience in the Field , 2021, Energies.

[12]  Annika K. Jägerbrand,et al.  Perceived Lighting Uniformity on Pedestrian Roads: From an Architectural Perspective , 2021, Energies.

[13]  A. Lis,et al.  Why is dense vegetation in city parks unpopular? The mediative role of sense of privacy and safety , 2021 .

[14]  A. Lis,et al.  Where do we want to see other people while relaxing in a city park? Visual relationships with park users and their impact on preferences, safety and privacy , 2021 .

[15]  Erik Cuevas,et al.  An Evolutionary Approach to Improve the Halftoning Process , 2020, Mathematics.

[16]  S. Bell,et al.  Use of mixed methods in road landscape perception studies: an example from Latvia , 2020, Landscape architecture and art.

[17]  Chuan-Kai Yang,et al.  Photo Composition with Real-Time Rating , 2020, Sensors.

[18]  Jeffrey C. Hallo,et al.  Informing good lighting in parks through visitors’ perceptions and experiences , 2019 .

[19]  Ling Qiu,et al.  Comparisons of Landscape Preferences through Three Different Perceptual Approaches , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[20]  A. Lis,et al.  Impact of Vegetation on Perceived Safety and Preference in City Parks , 2019, Sustainability.

[21]  J Uttley,et al.  Evaluation of pedestrian reassurance gained by higher illuminances in residential streets using the day–dark approach , 2019 .

[22]  A. Lis,et al.  Why do we choose fear-evoking spots in parks? The role of danger and privacy in the model of dependence between spatial attributes and preference , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[23]  C. Kyba,et al.  Insect declines and agroecosystems: does light pollution matter? , 2018, Annals of Applied Biology.

[24]  Taylor Stone.  Re-envisioning the Nocturnal Sublime: On the Ethics and Aesthetics of Nighttime Lighting , 2018, Topoi.

[25]  K. Gaston,et al.  Impacts of Artificial Light at Night on Biological Timings , 2017 .

[26]  L. Guanter,et al.  Artificially lit surface of Earth at night increasing in radiance and extent , 2017, Science Advances.

[27]  A. Haans,et al.  Illuminating for Safety: Investigating the Role of Lighting Appraisals on the Perception of Safety in the Urban Environment , 2017, Environment and behavior.

[28]  Taylor Stone.  The Value of Darkness: A Moral Framework for Urban Nighttime Lighting , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[29]  Mikkel Bille,et al.  Lighting up cosy atmospheres in Denmark , 2015 .

[30]  T. Edensor.  The gloomy city: Rethinking the relationship between light and dark , 2015 .

[31]  T. Laqueur.  Evening’s Empire: A History of the Night in Early Modern Europe. By Craig Koslofsky. New Studies in European History. Edited by Peter Baldwin et al.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Pp. xvi+431. $90.00 (cloth); $29.99 (paper). , 2014 .

[32]  K. Gaston,et al.  Demographic effects of artificial nighttime lighting on animal populations , 2014 .

[33]  U. Lindh.  Distribution of light and atmosphere in an urban environment , 2013 .

[34]  A Antal Haans,et al.  Light distribution in dynamic street lighting: Two experimental studies on its effects on perceived safety, prospect, concealment, and escape , 2012 .

[35]  A. Toet,et al.  Effects of signals of disorder on fear of crime in real and virtual environments , 2012 .

[36]  J. Nasar,et al.  Evaluative Appraisals of Environmental Mystery and Surprise , 2011 .

[37]  T. R. Herzog,et al.  Mystery and Preference in Within-Forest Settings , 2007 .

[38]  A. Stamps.  Entropy and Environmental Mystery , 2007, Perceptual and motor skills.

[39]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Mystery of Environmental Mystery , 2007 .

[40]  Patrick Parnaby,et al.  Crime Prevention through Environmental Design: Discourses of Risk, Social Control, and a Neo-liberal Context , 2006 .

[41]  T. Herzog,et al.  Pathway Curvature and Border Visibility as Predictors of Preference and Danger in Forest Settings , 2005 .

[42]  T. R. Herzog,et al.  Legibility, Mystery, and Visual Access as Predictors of Preference and Perceived Danger in Forest Settings without Pathways , 2004 .

[43]  Travis Longcore,et al.  Ecological light pollution , 2004 .

[44]  T. R. Herzog,et al.  Searching for Legibility , 2003 .

[45]  S Plainis,et al.  Reaction times as an index of visual conspicuity when driving at night , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[46]  Thomas R. Herzog,et al.  The Role of Mystery in Perceived Danger and Environmental Preference , 1998 .

[47]  Kazunori Hanyu,et al.  VISUAL PROPERTIES AND AFFECTIVE APPRAISALS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS AFTER DARK , 1997 .

[48]  D. M. Pedersen.  PSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF PRIVACY , 1997 .

[49]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Landscapes of Fear and Stress , 1997 .

[50]  K. Painter.  The influence of street lighting improvements on crime, fear and pedestrian street use, after dark , 1996 .

[51]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Fear of Crime in Relation to Three Exterior Site Features , 1992 .

[52]  Gregory A. Smith,et al.  Danger, Mystery, and Environmental Preference , 1988 .

[53]  J. Nasar,et al.  The emotional quality of scenes and observation points: A look at prospect and refuge , 1983 .

[54]  I. Altman.  A Conceptual Analysis , 1976 .

[55]  Pardela,et al.  The impact of plants offering cover on female students’ perception of danger in urban green spaces in crime hot spots , 2021 .

[56]  Taylor Stone.  Towards a Darker Future? Designing Environmental Values into the Next Generation of Streetlights , 2021 .

[57]  Michael J. Ostwald,et al.  Prospect and refuge theory: constructing a critical definition for architecture and design , 2013 .

[58]  Heli Nikunen,et al.  Perceptions of lighting, perceived restorativeness, preference and fear in outdoor spaces , 2013 .

[59]  D. Alfred Owens,et al.  Twilight vision and road safety: Seeing more than we notice but less than we think. , 2003 .

[60]  Ken Pease,et al.  A review of street lighting evaluations: crime reduction effects , 1999 .