Is the learn unit a fundamental measure of pedagogy?

We propose a measure of teaching, the learn unit, that explicitly describes the interaction between teachers and their students. The theoretical, educational research, and applied behavior analysis literatures all converge on the learn unit as a fundamental measure of teaching. The theoretical literature proposes the construct of the interlocking operant and embraces verbal behavior, social interaction, and translations of psychological constructs into complex theoretical respondent—operant interactions and behavior—behavior relations. Research findings in education and applied behavior analysis on engaged academic time, opportunity to respond, active student responding, teacher— student responding, student—teacher responding, tutor—tutee responding, tutee—tutor responding, and verbal episodes between individuals all support a measure of interlocking responses. More recently, research analyzing the components of both the students’ and teachers’ behavior suggests that the learn unit is the strongest predictor of effective teaching. Finally, we propose applications of the learn unit to other issues in pedagogy not yet researched and the relation of learn units to the verbal behavior of students.

[1]  R. D. Greer,et al.  A sustained analysis of the behaviors of schooling , 1989 .

[2]  B. Hart,et al.  In vivo language intervention: unanticipated general effects. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[3]  A. Staats Paradigmatic behaviorism, unified theory, unified theory construction methods, and the Zeitgeist of separatism. , 1981 .

[4]  R. D. Greer Contingencies of the Science and Technology of Teaching and Pre-behavioristic Research Practices in Education , 1983 .

[5]  Jane A. Stallings Allocated Academic Learning Time Revisited, or Beyond Time on Task , 1980 .

[6]  Ernst Mach,et al.  The Science of Mechanics , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[7]  K. R. Johnson,et al.  Breaking the structuralist barrier. Literacy and numeracy with fluency. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[8]  C. Greenwood,et al.  The behavior analyst consulting model: Identifying and validating naturally effective instructional models , 1991 .

[9]  M. Sidman Tactics of Scientific Research , 1960 .

[10]  R. D. Greer,et al.  The speaker as listener. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  M L Sundberg,et al.  The Application of Establishing Operations , 1993, The Behavior analyst.

[12]  R. D. Greer,et al.  Collateral gains and short-term maintenance in reading and on-task responses by inner-city adolescents as a function of their use of social reinforcement while tutoring. , 1982, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  P. Magrab,et al.  The effect of a token economy on dietary compliance for children on hemodialysis. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[14]  James G. Holland,et al.  The Analysis of Behavior , 1964 .

[15]  R. M. Elliott,et al.  Behavior of Organisms , 1991 .

[16]  K. R. Johnson,et al.  Verbal relations within instruction: Are there subclasses of the intraverbal? , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  R. D. Greer,et al.  Remediation of mutually aversive interactions between a problem student and four teachers by training the student in reinforcement techniques. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[18]  W. L. Heward Three "low-tech" strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. , 1994 .

[19]  H. Pennypacker,et al.  Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research , 1980 .

[20]  J. Brophy Teacher behavior and student achievement , 1984 .

[21]  B. Skinner,et al.  Science and human behavior , 1953 .

[22]  David C. Palmer,et al.  Learning and Complex Behavior , 1993 .

[23]  J. Michael Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  M. Werts,et al.  Effects of Simultaneous Prompting and Instructive Feedback , 1993 .

[25]  David C. Berliner,et al.  Perspectives on instructional time , 1985 .

[26]  J. Ducharme,et al.  Behavioral momentum and stimulus fading in the acquisition and maintenance of child compliance in the home. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[27]  D M Baer,et al.  An implicit technology of generalization. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[28]  A REPLICATION OF COLLATERAL EFFECTS AND A COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF A SUCCESSFUL TUTORING PACKAGE FOR INNER-CITY ADOLESCENTS , 1986 .

[29]  R. D. Greer,et al.  A functional analysis of the comprehensive application of behavior analysis to schooling. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[30]  O. R. Lindsley,et al.  Precision teaching's unique legacy from B. F. Skinner , 1991 .

[31]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  Longitudinal Effects of Classwide Peer Tutoring. , 1989 .

[32]  T. M. Sherman,et al.  An investigation of the influence of student behavior on teacher behavior. , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[33]  R. D. Greer,et al.  Acting to Save Our Schools (1984–1994) , 1996 .

[34]  R. D. Greer,et al.  A systematic replication and a comparative analysis of CABAS , 1991 .

[35]  D. Hamburg Today's Children:: Creating a Future for a Generation in Crisis , 1992 .

[36]  S. Bijou What psychology has to offer education-now. , 1970, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[37]  R. Hall,et al.  Effects of teacher attention on study behavior. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[38]  F. Keller "Good-bye, teacher...". , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[39]  I. Goldiamond Toward a Constructional Approach to Social Problems: Ethical and Constitutional Issues Raised by Applied Behavior Analysis , 2002, Behaviorism.

[40]  M. Sundberg,et al.  Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations , 1987, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[41]  Phillipp Meister,et al.  Technology for Teaching , 2012 .

[42]  J. Lamarre,et al.  The functional independence of mands and tacts. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[43]  D. R. Thomas,et al.  Rules, praise, and ignoring: elements of elementary classroom control. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[44]  T. Ollendick,et al.  Increasing spelling achievement: an analysis of treatment procedures utilizing an alternating treatments design. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[45]  Douglas Carnine,et al.  Theory of instruction : principles and applications , 1982 .

[46]  R. Malott The Achievement of Evasive Goals , 1989 .

[47]  E. R. White,et al.  Adult Approval and Students' Music Selection Behavior , 1973 .

[48]  D. Carnine,et al.  Increasing the rate of presentation and use of signals in elementary classroom teachers. , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[49]  Setting events controlling social verbal exchanges between students with developmental delays , 1993 .

[50]  R. Douglas Greer,et al.  Is the three-term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction? , 1991 .

[51]  O. R. Lindsley Precision teaching: Discoveries and effects. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[52]  J. Bell,et al.  Comparison of simultaneous prompting with and without error correction in teaching science vocabulary words to high school students with mild disabilities , 1996 .

[53]  R. D. Greer,et al.  Changes in student and teacher responses in observed and generalized settings as a function of supervisor observations. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[54]  R. D. Greer A systems analysis of the behaviors of schooling , 1994 .

[55]  F. Shields,et al.  Modification of arithmetic response rate and attending behavior in a seventh-grade student. , 1972, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.