Reconciling garbage cans and rational actors: Explaining organizational decisions about environmental hazard management
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Clarke,et al. Open and Closed Systems of Decision Making: The Case of Toxic Waste Management , 1984 .
[2] W. Kip Viscusi,et al. Conservative versus Mean Risk Assessments: Implications for Superfund Policies , 1997 .
[3] Michael X Cohen,et al. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .
[4] Hilary A. Sigman. The Pace of Progress at Superfund Sites: Policy Goals and Interest Group Influence* , 2000, The Journal of Law and Economics.
[5] Johan P. Olsen,et al. Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .
[6] Jonathan Bendor,et al. Recycling the Garbage Can: An Assessment of the Research Program , 2001, American Political Science Review.
[7] Scott D. Sagan. The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons , 1993 .
[8] Hilary A. Sigman. Liability Funding and Superfund Clean-Up Remedies , 1998 .
[9] G. Houtven,et al. Do benefits and costs matter in environmental regulation: An analysis of EPA decisions under Superfund , 1994 .
[10] J. Hird. Superfund expenditures and cleanup priorities: Distributive politics or the public interest? , 1990 .
[11] Johan P. Olsen. Public Policy-Making and Theories of Organizational Choice , 1972 .
[12] G. Hoberg,et al. Risk, Science, and Politics: Regulating Toxic Substances in Canada and the United States , 1994 .
[13] Johan P. Olsen. Garbage Cans, New Institutionalism, and the Study of Politics , 2001, American Political Science Review.
[14] John A. Hird,et al. Environmental policy and equity: The case of superfund , 1993 .
[15] E. Johnsen. Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .
[16] Harold C. Barnett. Toxic Debts and the Superfund Dilemma , 1994 .
[17] Joseph G. Morone,et al. Averting Catastrophe: Strategies for Regulating Risky Technologies , 1986 .
[18] Thomas W. Church,et al. Cleaning Up the Mess: Implementation Strategies in Superfund , 1993 .
[19] D. L. Simms,et al. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .
[20] Clifford Nass,et al. The Lid on the Garbage Can: Institutional Constraints on Decision Making in the Technical Core of College-Text Publishers. , 1989 .
[21] J. March,et al. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .
[22] Curtis C. Travis,et al. The Superfund remedial action decision process , 1988 .
[23] E. Laumann,et al. Who Works with Whom? Interest Group Alliances and Opposition , 1987, American Political Science Review.
[24] Katherine N. Probst. Footing the Bill for Superfund Cleanups: Who Pays and How? , 1995 .
[25] E. Laumann,et al. An Organizational Approach to State Policy Formation: A Comparative Study of Energy and Health Domains , 1985 .
[26] John W. Kingdon. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .
[27] Stephen J. Mezias,et al. Resolving Financial Reporting Problems: An Institutional Analysis of the Process , 1994 .
[28] David P. Fan,et al. Predictions of Public Opinion from the Mass Media: Computer Content Analysis and Mathematical Modeling , 1988 .
[29] K. Wernstedt,et al. Grounding hazardous waste cleanups: a promising remedy? , 1999 .
[30] Cheryl Hogue. Counting down to zero , 2002 .