Visualizing the commognitive processes in computer-supported one-to-one tutoring

ABSTRACT This study aims to visualize the commognitive processes in computer-supported one-to-one teaching and learning. By commognitive processes we mean cognitive processes and interpersonal communication. A 6-years mathematics teacher and a 15-year-old boy in China, who have done computer-supported one-to-one tutoring, were chosen to be the samples. We collected four computer-supported one-to-one tutoring videos (60–90 min) about one chapter of mathematical set knowledge between one teacher and one student, and 30 min interview video from the teacher. Based on Bloom's cognitive classification theory and commognition theory, we develop a commognitive classification framework, then encode and visualize the videos. We found that mathematics commognition processes can be divided into six levels and classified into three types: teacher-lead, student-lead, and teacher-student comparison.

[1]  K. Meyer,et al.  A National Study of Training Content and Activities for Faculty Development for Online Teaching , 2014 .

[2]  C. Boxtel,et al.  Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. , 2000 .

[3]  N. Ding,et al.  Visualizing the sequential process of knowledge elaboration in computer-supported collaborative problem solving , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[5]  Laura M. O’Dwyer,et al.  Special Edition: Educational Outcomes and Research from 1:1 Computing Settings , 2010 .

[6]  A. King.  Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. , 1999 .

[7]  Christina M. Tschida,et al.  How Faculty Learn To Teach Online: What Administrators Need to Know , 2016 .

[8]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. , 1999 .

[9]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  One-to-One Technology-Enhanced Learning: an Opportunity for Global Research Collaboration , 2006, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[10]  Yong Zhao,et al.  One-to-One Computing: What Does it Bring to Schools? , 2008 .

[11]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[12]  Patrick Griffin,et al.  Linking Developmental Progressions to Teaching , 2015 .

[13]  Ekaterina Ginzburg,et al.  The Digital Learning Faculty Certificate Program , 2010 .

[14]  A. Sfard.  Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing , 2008 .

[15]  Anna Sfard,et al.  When the Rules of Discourse Change, but Nobody Tells You: Making Sense of Mathematics Learning From a Commognitive Standpoint , 2007 .

[16]  Kathryn Kennedy,et al.  Offering Preservice Teachers Field Experiences in K-12 Online Learning , 2012 .

[17]  Linda F. Cornelious,et al.  Preparing Instructors for Quality Online Instruction. , 2005 .

[18]  David H. Covington,et al.  Best Practices: A Triangulated Support Approach in Transitioning Faculty to Online Teaching , 2005 .

[19]  Mark E. Weston,et al.  The End of Techno-Critique: The Naked Truth about 1:1 Laptop Initiatives and Educational Change , 2010 .

[20]  Leanna Archambault,et al.  The Practitioner’s Perspective on Teacher Education: Preparing for the K-12 Online Classroom , 2011 .

[21]  Luis E. Anido-Rifón,et al.  Internet-based learning by doing , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[22]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Supporting application development in the Semantic Web , 2003 .