Common Pitfalls in Analysis of Tissue Scores

Histopathology remains an important source of descriptive biological data in biomedical research. Recent petitions for enhanced reproducibility in scientific studies have elevated the role of tissue scoring (semiquantitative and quantitative) in research studies. Effective tissue scoring requires appropriate statistical analysis to help validate the group comparisons and give the pathologist confidence in interpreting the data. Each statistical test is typically founded on underlying assumptions regarding the data. If the underlying assumptions of a statistical test do not match the data, then these tests can lead to increased risk of erroneous interpretations of the data. The choice of appropriate statistical test is influenced by the study’s experimental design and resultant data (eg, paired vs unpaired, normality, number of groups, etc). Here, we identify 3 common pitfalls in the analysis of tissue scores: shopping for significance, overuse of paired t-tests, and misguided analysis of multiple groups. Finally, we encourage pathologists to use the full breadth of resources available to them, such as using statistical software, reading key publications about statistical approaches, and identifying a statistician to serve as a collaborator on the multidisciplinary research team. These collective resources can be helpful in choosing the appropriate statistical test for tissue-scoring data to provide the most valid interpretation for the pathologist.

[1]  Toni C Antonucci.  Teams Do It Better! , 2015, Research in human development.

[2]  H G Allore,et al.  Designing Phenotyping Studies for Genetically Engineered Mice , 2012, Veterinary pathology.

[3]  D. Meyerholz,et al.  Principles for Valid Histopathologic Scoring in Research , 2013, Veterinary pathology.

[4]  S. Shott.  Comparing percentages. , 2011, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[5]  Hae-Young Kim,et al.  Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Nonparametric statistical methods: 2. Nonparametric methods for comparing three or more groups and repeated measures , 2014, Restorative dentistry & endodontics.

[6]  David K. Meyerholz,et al.  Mouse-adapted MERS coronavirus causes lethal lung disease in human DPP4 knockin mice , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  S. Shott.  Testing ideas and estimating clinical importance. , 2011, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[8]  S. Shott.  Comparing means or distributions. , 2011, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[9]  S. Shott.  Detecting statistical errors in veterinary research. , 2011, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[10]  S. Shott.  Relationships between categorical dependent variables and other variables and between waiting times and other variables. , 2011, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[11]  S. Shott.  Designing studies that answer questions. , 2011, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[12]  S. Shott.  Statistics simplified. Describing data. , 2011, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[13]  Paul J. Watson,et al.  Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science , 1999 .

[14]  S. Shott.  Relationships between two categorical variables and between two noncategorical variables. , 2011, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[15]  A. Carr,et al.  Lung Inflammation Associated With Clinical Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis in Dogs , 2017, Veterinary Pathology-Supplement.

[16]  Hae-Young Kim.  Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Nonparametric statistical methods: 1. Nonparametric methods for comparing two groups , 2014, Restorative dentistry & endodontics.

[17]  S. Shott.  Relationships between more than two variables. , 2011, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[18]  Cara H Olsen,et al.  Review of the Use of Statistics inInfection andImmunity , 2003, Infection and Immunity.

[19]  M. Festing.  Design and statistical methods in studies using animal models of development. , 2006, ILAR journal.

[20]  Amanda P. Beck,et al.  Principles and approaches for reproducible scoring of tissue stains in research , 2018, Laboratory Investigation.

[21]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals , 2009, PloS one.

[22]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Apical Elongation of Molar Teeth in Captive Microtus Voles , 2018, Veterinary pathology.

[23]  Amanda P. Beck,et al.  Approaches to Evaluate Lung Inflammation in Translational Research , 2018, Veterinary pathology.

[24]  Y. Skaik.  The bread and butter of statistical analysis “t-test”: Uses and misuses , 2015, Pakistan journal of medical sciences.