Effects of trophic similarity on community composition.

Understanding how ecological processes determine patterns among species coexisting within ecosystems is central to ecology. Here, we explore relationships between species' local coexistence and their trophic niches in terms of their feeding relationships both as consumers and as resources. We build on recent concepts and methods from community phylogenetics to develop a framework for analysing mechanisms responsible for community composition using trophic similarity among species and null models of community assembly. We apply this framework to 50 food webs found in 50 Adirondack lakes and find that species composition in these communities appears to be driven by both bottom-up effects by which the presence of prey species selects for predators of those prey, and top-down effects by which prey more tolerant of predation out-compete less tolerant prey of the same predators. This approach to community food webs is broadly applicable and shows how species interaction networks can inform an increasingly large array of theory central to community ecology.

[1]  S. Walker,et al.  The ecology of differences: assessing community assembly with trait and evolutionary distances. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[2]  K. Havens.  Zooplankton Structure and Potential Food Web Interactions in the Plankton of a Subtropical Chain-of-Lakes , 2002, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[3]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition , 2002 .

[4]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Functional Traits and Niche-Based Tree Community Assembly in an Amazonian Forest , 2008, Science.

[5]  John Harte,et al.  Response of complex food webs to realistic extinction sequences. , 2007, Ecology.

[6]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  The dissimilarity of species interaction networks. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[7]  Michael E. Gilpin,et al.  Factors contributing to non-randomness in species Co-occurrences on Islands , 2004, Oecologia.

[8]  R. Holt.  Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[9]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. , 2006, Ecology.

[10]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic Overdispersion in Floridian Oak Communities , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  TROPHIC RANK AND THE SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP , 1999 .

[12]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[13]  D. Simberloff,et al.  TESTS OF COMMUNITY‐WIDE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AGAINST NULL HYPOTHESES , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  É. Thébault,et al.  Does asymmetric specialization differ between mutualistic and trophic networks , 2008 .

[15]  C. Graham,et al.  Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[16]  B. Emerson,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Sonia Kéfi,et al.  More than a meal… integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[18]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Trait Evolution, Community Assembly, and the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[19]  A. Neutel,et al.  Energetics, Patterns of Interaction Strengths, and Stability in Real Ecosystems , 1995, Science.

[20]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[21]  G. Polis,et al.  THE ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF INTRAGUILD PREDATION: Potential Competitors That Eat Each Other , 1989 .

[22]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food‐web assembly during a classic biogeographic study: species’“trophic breadth” corresponds to colonization order , 2008 .

[23]  N. Salamin,et al.  Turnover of plant lineages shapes herbivore phylogenetic beta diversity along ecological gradients. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[24]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Adaptation, Niche Conservatism, and Convergence: Comparative Studies of Leaf Evolution in the California Chaparral , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[25]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[26]  Jean-Pierre Gabriel,et al.  Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure , 2004, Nature.

[27]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  J. Losos,et al.  Exceptional Convergence on the Macroevolutionary Landscape in Island Lizard Radiations , 2013, Science.

[29]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[30]  Corinne Vacher,et al.  Architecture of an Antagonistic Tree/Fungus Network: The Asymmetric Influence of Past Evolutionary History , 2008, PloS one.

[31]  C. Elton.  Competition and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1946 .

[32]  Steven W Kembel,et al.  Disentangling niche and neutral influences on community assembly: assessing the performance of community phylogenetic structure tests. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[33]  Neo D. Martinez.  Artifacts or Attributes? Effects of Resolution on the Little Rock Lake Food Web , 1991 .

[34]  D. Irschick,et al.  Evolutionary conservatism and convergence both lead to striking similarity in ecology, morphology and performance across continents in frogs , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Hélène Morlon,et al.  Spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity , 2011, Ecology letters.

[36]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[37]  Laura A Burkle,et al.  The future of plant-pollinator diversity: understanding interaction networks across time, space, and global change. , 2011, American journal of botany.

[38]  Charles M. Newman,et al.  A stochastic theory of community food webs I. Models and aggregated data , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[39]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  A General Model for Food Web Structure , 2008, Science.

[40]  J. Grinnell.  The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher , 1917 .

[41]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[42]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  The Robustness and Restoration of a Network of Ecological Networks , 2012, Science.

[43]  Ricard V Solé,et al.  Reciprocal specialization in ecological networks. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[44]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Accounting for dispersal and biotic interactions to disentangle the drivers of species distributions and their abundances. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[45]  P. Raven,et al.  BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION , 1964 .

[46]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Trophic theory of island biogeography. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[47]  Marta Sales-Pardo,et al.  Evolutionary Conservation of Species’ Roles in Food Webs , 2012, Science.

[48]  A. Prinzing.  The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Heather C. McKenny,et al.  A Network Extension of Species Occupancy Models in a Patchy Environment Applied to the Yosemite Toad (Anaxyrus canorus) , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  J. J. Jansen,et al.  Birds exploit herbivore-induced plant volatiles to locate herbivorous prey. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[51]  A. Ives,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Trophic Associations , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[52]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition? , 1979 .

[53]  Jens O. Riede,et al.  Stepping in Elton's footprints: a general scaling model for body masses and trophic levels across ecosystems. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[54]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES WITH PREDATOR INTERFERENCE: VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE HOLLING TYPE II MODEL , 2001 .

[55]  F. P. Ojeda,et al.  Guild structure of carnivorous intertidal fishes of the Chilean coast: implications of ontogenetic dietary shifts , 1998, Oecologia.

[56]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  J. Losos.  Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[58]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[59]  K. Havens,et al.  Scale and Structure in Natural Food Webs , 1992, Science.

[60]  S. Miller,et al.  Low beta diversity of herbivorous insects in tropical forests , 2007, Nature.

[61]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[62]  Brian J Enquist,et al.  The influence of spatial and size scale on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities. , 2007, Ecology.

[63]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology , 2010, Bioinform..

[64]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple rules yield complex food webs , 2000, Nature.

[65]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Analysis of a summary network of co-infection in humans reveals that parasites interact most via shared resources , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[67]  Annette Ostling,et al.  Unified spatial scaling of species and their trophic interactions , 2004, Nature.

[68]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Compartments in a marine food web associated with phylogeny, body mass, and habitat structure. , 2009, Ecology letters.