Methodological improvements in the risk analysis of an urban hydrogen fueling station

Abstract The Fuel Cell Vehicles are going to be introduced in domestic cities of China, which will require urban Hydrogen Refueling Stations (HRS). Such urban refueling center would be a public concern given their location in the congested area and the potential hydrogen release and fire risk. Risk analysis of possible fire scenarios is an efficient approach to identify, evaluate, and mitigate the risk from such hydrogen fire accidents. However, due to lack of availability of data, there still exists high parametric uncertainty in the scenario envisaging risk analysis. It is crucial to minimize this parametric uncertainty to have robust hydrogen fire risk analysis. If minimizing the corresponding uncertainty, traditional procedure could bring much computational intensity. This paper proposes a robustly integrated procedure of the fire risk analysis for the urban HRS to reduce the uncertainty and the computational intensity. This newly proposed procedure integrates the Bayesian Regularization Artificial Neural Network (BRANN)-based non-intrusive method with the consequence modeling and statistical approaches. A case study is conducted to demonstrate the scenario-related parametric uncertainty effect and the feasibility of the procedure. The results indicate 300 simulation inputs are the optimal trade-off between the BRANN model’s generalization capacity and computational intensity. With such number of simulations, the BRANN model could achieve the R2 = 0.98. In addition, the proposed procedure could reduce the parametric uncertainty and computation cost by 97% and 99%, respectively.

[1]  Guowei Ma,et al.  A grid-based risk screening method for fire and explosion events of hydrogen refuelling stations , 2018 .

[2]  S. Markose,et al.  The Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) Distribution, Implied Tail Index and Option Pricing , 2011 .

[3]  Kevin McNally,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Dispersion Models for Jet Releases of Dense-Phase Carbon Dioxide , 2013 .

[4]  Depeng Kong,et al.  Stochastic analysis of explosion risk for ultra-deep-water semi-submersible offshore platforms , 2019, Ocean Engineering.

[5]  Xiangmin Pan,et al.  Risk analysis on mobile hydrogen refueling stations in Shanghai , 2014 .

[6]  Guoming Chen,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian network based approach for risk analysis of hydrogen generation unit leakage , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[7]  Ethan S. Hecht,et al.  HyRAM: A methodology and toolkit for quantitative risk assessment of hydrogen systems , 2017 .

[8]  Beom-Seon Jang,et al.  Probabilistic fire risk analysis and structural safety assessment of FPSO topside module , 2015 .

[9]  Shigeki Kikukawa,et al.  Consequence analysis and safety verification of hydrogen fueling stations using CFD simulation , 2008 .

[10]  Zhiyong Li,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment on 2010 Expo hydrogen station , 2011 .

[11]  Dian-Qing Li,et al.  Reliability analysis of serviceability performance for an underground cavern using a non-intrusive stochastic method , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[12]  Young Hee Lee,et al.  Development of Korean hydrogen fueling station codes through risk analysis , 2011 .

[13]  Quang-Vu Bach,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment of an urban hydrogen refueling station , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[14]  Iraj Mohammadfam,et al.  Safety risk modeling and major accidents analysis of hydrogen and natural gas releases: A comprehensive risk analysis framework , 2015 .

[15]  Shigeki Kikukawa,et al.  Risk assessment of Hydrogen fueling stations for 70 MPa FCVs , 2008 .

[16]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Accident modelling and safety measure design of a hydrogen station , 2014 .

[17]  Kunpeng Li,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference for Approximate Factor Models of High Dimension , 2016, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[18]  Mehrdad Raisee,et al.  An efficient non-intrusive reduced basis model for high dimensional stochastic problems in CFD , 2016 .

[19]  Kevin Eldridge,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of dispersion models for point and area sources , 1982 .

[20]  P. Friis-Hansen,et al.  Risk modelling of a hydrogen refuelling station using Bayesian network , 2011 .

[21]  Naoya Kasai,et al.  Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen-gasoline fueling station , 2016 .

[22]  Daejun Chang,et al.  Determination of design accidental fire load for offshore installations based on quantitative risk assessment with treatment of parametric uncertainty , 2017 .

[23]  Atsumi Miyake,et al.  Risk assessment for liquid hydrogen fueling stations , 2009 .

[24]  João Cardoso,et al.  Review and application of Artificial Neural Networks models in reliability analysis of steel structures , 2015 .

[25]  Pan Xiangmin,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment on a gaseous hydrogen refueling station in Shanghai , 2010 .

[26]  Yang Liang,et al.  The simulation and analysis of leakage and explosion at a renewable hydrogen refuelling station , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[27]  Hans J. Pasman,et al.  Risk assessment by means of Bayesian networks: A comparative study of compressed and liquefied H2 transportation and tank station risks , 2012 .

[28]  Souvik Chakraborty,et al.  Assessment of polynomial correlated function expansion for high-fidelity structural reliability analysis , 2016 .

[29]  Jeffrey L. LaChance,et al.  Analyses to support development of risk-informed separation distances for hydrogen codes and standards. , 2009 .

[30]  Ng Tran,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Phast's Atmospheric Dispersion Model for Two Industrial Use Cases , 2013 .

[31]  A. Marangon,et al.  Consequence assessment of the BBC H2 refuelling station using the ADREA-HF code , 2011 .

[32]  Naoya Kasai,et al.  Leakage-type-based analysis of accidents involving hydrogen fueling stations in Japan and USA , 2016 .