Prognostic value of cardiac hybrid imaging integrating single-photon emission computed tomography with coronary computed tomography angiography.

Aims Although cardiac hybrid imaging, fusing single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), provides important complementary diagnostic information for coronary artery disease (CAD) assessment, no prognostic data exist on the predictive value of cardiac hybrid imaging. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of hybrid SPECT/CCTA images. Methods and results Of 335 consecutive patients undergoing a 1-day stress/rest (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT and a CCTA, acquired on stand-alone scanners and fused to obtain cardiac hybrid images, follow-up was obtained in 324 patients (97%). Survival free of all-cause death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and free of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, MI, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, coronary revascularizations) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method for the following groups: (i) stenosis by CCTA and matching reversible SPECT defect; (ii) unmatched CCTA and SPECT finding; and (iii) normal finding by CCTA and SPECT. Cox's proportional hazard regression was used to identify independent predictors for cardiac events. At a median follow-up of 2.8 years (25th-75th percentile: 1.9-3.6), 69 MACE occurred in 47 patients, including 20 death/MI. A corresponding matched hybrid image finding was associated with a significantly higher death/MI incidence (P < 0.005) and proved to be an independent predictor for MACE. The annual death/MI rate was 6.0, 2.8, and 1.3% for patients with matched, unmatched, and normal findings. Conclusion Cardiac hybrid imaging allows risk stratification in patients with known or suspected CAD. A matched defect on hybrid image is a strong predictor of MACE.

[1]  I. Burger,et al.  Rapid cardiac hybrid imaging with minimized radiation dose for accurate non-invasive assessment of ischemic coronary artery disease. , 2011, International journal of cardiology.

[2]  Sanjay Kaul,et al.  Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  I. Burger,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease with CT coronary angiography and SPECT: a novel dose-saving fast-track algorithm , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  B. Chow,et al.  Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging to detect flow-limiting stenoses: a potential gatekeeper for coronary revascularization? , 2009, European heart journal.

[7]  L. Husmann,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating. , 2009, European heart journal.

[8]  L. Husmann,et al.  Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging: cardiac hybrid imaging below 3mSv. , 2009, European heart journal.

[9]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Tracy L. Faber,et al.  Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. , 2008, European heart journal.

[12]  M. D. Di Carli,et al.  Methods and Limitations of Assessing New Noninvasive Tests: Part II: Outcomes-Based Validation and Reliability Assessment of Noninvasive Testing , 2008, Circulation.

[13]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease , 2008, European Radiology.

[14]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[15]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging , 2007, Circulation.

[17]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Cardiac Image Fusion from Stand-Alone SPECT and CT: Clinical Experience , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  Maria Siebes,et al.  Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. , 2006, Circulation.

[20]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Integrated PET/CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Oliver Lindner,et al.  Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT perfusion images with low-dose CT: evaluation of the method by comparison with perfusion PET. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  J. Heo,et al.  Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in predicting outcome after renal transplantation. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). , 2003, Circulation.

[24]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Prognostic value of dobutamine-atropine stress (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  D. Berman,et al.  Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  G. Diamond,et al.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  T. Kuwahara,et al.  Incremental value of combining 64-slice computed tomography angiography with stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging to improve noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[28]  R. Gibbons ACC/AHA guideline for management of patients with chronic stable angina , 2003 .