Comparing Conventional and Augmented Reality Instructions for Manual Assembly Tasks

Augmented Reality (AR) gains increased attention as a means to provide assistance for different human activities. Hereby the suitability of AR does not only depend on the respective task, but also to a high degree on the respective device. In a standardized assembly task, we tested AR-based in-situ assistance against conventional pictorial instructions using a smartphone, Microsoft HoloLens and Epson Moverio BT-200 smart glasses as well as paper-based instructions. Participants solved the task fastest using the paper instructions, but made less errors with AR assistance on the Microsoft HoloLens smart glasses than with any other system. Methodically we propose operational definitions of time segments and other optimizations for standardized benchmarking of AR assembly instructions.

[1]  Markus Funk,et al.  Mobile In-Situ Pick-by-Vision: Order Picking Support using a Projector Helmet , 2016, PETRA.

[2]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly , 2003, CHI '03.

[3]  Thies Pfeiffer,et al.  Attention guiding techniques using peripheral vision and eye tracking for feedback in augmented-reality-based assistance systems , 2017, 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[4]  Sebastian Büttner,et al.  smARt.Assembly - Projection-Based Augmented Reality for Supporting Assembly Workers , 2016, HCI.

[5]  Kiyoshi Kiyokawa,et al.  The effectiveness of an AR-based context-aware assembly support system in object assembly , 2014, 2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[6]  Markus Funk,et al.  Interactive worker assistance: comparing the effects of in-situ projection, head-mounted displays, tablet, and paper instructions , 2016, UbiComp.

[7]  Gudrun Klinker,et al.  Supporting order picking with Augmented Reality , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[8]  Tobias Höllerer,et al.  Integrating the physical environment into mobile remote collaboration , 2012, Mobile HCI.

[9]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Evaluating the benefits of augmented reality for task localization in maintenance of an armored personnel carrier turret , 2009, 2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[10]  Dominic Gorecky,et al.  Developing a Mixed Reality Assistance System Based on Projection Mapping Technology for Manual Operations at Assembly Workstations , 2015 .

[11]  Markus Funk,et al.  Using In-Situ Projection to Support Cognitively Impaired Workers at the Workplace , 2015, ASSETS.

[12]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[13]  Markus Funk,et al.  A benchmark for interactive augmented reality instructions for assembly tasks , 2015, MUM.

[14]  Didier Stricker,et al.  Real-time modeling and tracking manual workflows from first-person vision , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[15]  T. P. Caudell,et al.  Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.