The Importance of ECG Offset Correction for Premature Ventricular Contraction Origin Localization from Clinical Data

Abstract In this study, the inverse solution with a single dipole was computed to localize the premature ventricular contraction (PVC) origin from long term multiple leads ECG measurements on fourteen patients. The stability of the obtained results was studied with respect to the preprocessing of signals used as an input to the inverse solution and the complexity of the torso model. Two methods were used for the baseline drift removal. After an averaging of the heartbeats, the influence of the retention or elimination of the remaining offset at the beginning of the PVC signal was examined. The inverse computations were performed using both homogeneous and inhomogeneous patient-specific torso models. It was shown that the remaining offset in the averaged signals at the beginning of the PVC signal had the most significant impact on the stability of the resulting position within the ventricles. Its elimination stabilizes the location of the results, decreases the sensitivity to the torso model complexity and decreases the sensitivity to the primary baseline drift removal method. The additional offset correction decreased the mean distance between the results for all patients from 17-18 mm to 1-2 mm, regardless of the baseline drift removal method or the torso model complexity.

[1]  Jaume Coll-Font,et al.  Reducing Line-of-Block Artifacts in Cardiac Activation Maps Estimated Using ECG Imaging: A Comparison of Source Models and Estimation Methods , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Yesim Serinagaoglu Dogrusoz,et al.  The Impact of Torso Signal Processing on Noninvasive Electrocardiographic Imaging Reconstructions , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  M. Meo,et al.  Analysis of Signal-Averaged Electrocardiogram Performance for Body Surface Recordings , 2019, 2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[4]  Yesim Serinagaoglu Dogrusoz,et al.  Statistical Estimation Applied to Electrocardiographic Imaging , 2019, 2019 12th International Conference on Measurement.

[5]  Shijie Zhou,et al.  Localization of Activation Origin on Patient-Specific Epicardial Surface by Empirical Bayesian Method , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Jan Zelinka,et al.  Impact of Signal Preprocessing on the Inverse Localization of the Origin of Ventricular Pacing , 2018, 2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC).

[7]  G. Weber,et al.  Effects of a priori parameter selection in minimum relative entropy method on inverse electrocardiography problem , 2018 .

[8]  Jana Svehlikova,et al.  Geometrical constraint of sources in noninvasive localization of premature ventricular contractions. , 2018, Journal of electrocardiology.

[9]  B. Horáček,et al.  Localization of ventricular activation origin using patient‐specific geometry: Preliminary results , 2018, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[10]  G. Bukor,et al.  ProCardio 8 — System for high resolution ECG mapping , 2017, 2017 11th International Conference on Measurement.

[11]  Peter Kneppo,et al.  Influence of Torso Model Complexity on the Noninvasive Localization of Ectopic Ventricular Activity , 2016 .

[12]  María de la Salud Guillem Sánchez,et al.  Noninvasive identification of atrial fibrillation drivers: Simulation and patient data evaluation , 2016, 2016 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC).

[13]  Laura Bear,et al.  Effect of the torso conductivity heterogeneities on the ECGI inverse problem solution , 2015, 2015 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC).

[14]  R. Westra,et al.  Noninvasive reconstruction of cardiac electrical activity: update on current methods, applications and challenges , 2015, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[15]  Milan Tysler,et al.  Noninvasive identification of two lesions with local repolarization changes using two dipoles in inverse solution simulation study , 2015, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[16]  Kalyanam Shivkumar,et al.  Quantitative localization of premature ventricular contractions using myocardial activation ECGI from the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. , 2013, Journal of electrocardiology.

[17]  Jana Svehlikova,et al.  Noninvasive finding of local repolarization changes in the heart using dipole models and simplified torso geometry. , 2013, Journal of electrocardiology.

[18]  Yiheng Zhang,et al.  An analytical comparison of three spatio-temporal regularization methods for dynamic linear inverse problems in a common statistical framework , 2005 .

[19]  A. van Oosterom,et al.  Source parameter estimation in inhomogeneous volume conductors of arbitrary shape , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Kee-Koo Kwon,et al.  ECG PQRST complex detector and heart rate variability analysis using temporal characteristics of fiducial points , 2021, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[22]  I. Maros,et al.  Computational Aspects of Electrocardiological Inverse Solutions , 2015 .

[23]  Jiawei Han,et al.  K-Means Clustering , 2021, Learn Data Mining Through Excel.

[24]  F. Harris On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.