Legitimation, institutions and regional path creation: a cross-national study of offshore wind

ABSTRACT This paper assesses legitimation as a crucial dimension of industry emergence, addressing the neglect of institutional and political aspects of path creation in economic geography. It investigates how the legitimacy of emerging industries is built up over time and examines differences in legitimation across space. The paper focuses on the evolution of legitimation narratives in the context of national and regional differences in institutions, actors and assets. Based on a cross-national study of the offshore wind industry, the paper argues that cost reduction and value creation have made important contributions to legitimation in addition to climate change and energy security.

[1]  Danny MacKinnon,et al.  Creating strategic couplings in global production networks: regional institutions and lead firm investment in the Humber region, UK , 2019, Journal of Economic Geography.

[2]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  Shaping selection environments for industrial catch-up and sustainability transitions: A systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity , 2019, Research Policy.

[3]  T. Schmidt,et al.  Policy goals, partisanship and paradigmatic change in energy policy – analyzing parliamentary discourse in Germany over 30 years , 2019, Climate Policy.

[4]  S. Afewerki,et al.  Firm agency and global production network dynamics , 2019, European Planning Studies.

[5]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach , 2019, Economic Geography.

[6]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Configuring floating production networks: A case study of a new offshore wind technology across two oil and gas economies , 2018, Norwegian Journal of Geography.

[7]  R. Garud,et al.  Generative imitation, strategic distancing and optimal distinctiveness during the growth, decline and stabilization of Silicon Alley , 2018, Culture, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[8]  Gard Hopsdal Hansen,et al.  Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector , 2018, Progress in Planning.

[9]  Gard Hopsdal Hansen,et al.  Barriers to Path Creation: The Case of Offshore Wind Power in Norway , 2018 .

[10]  T. May.  [Letter: The Prime Minister] , 2017 .

[11]  R. Boschma.  Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: a research agenda , 2017 .

[12]  R. Boschma,et al.  Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies , 2017, Transitions in Regional Economic Development.

[13]  M. Steen.  Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: aspects of agency, temporality and methods , 2016 .

[14]  Oscar Fitch-Roy,et al.  An offshore wind union? Diversity and convergence in European offshore wind governance , 2016 .

[15]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Framing the sun: A discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada , 2016 .

[16]  F. Geels,et al.  The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014) , 2016 .

[17]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany , 2016 .

[18]  A. Buzogány,et al.  Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: When renewable energy hits different economic logics , 2016 .

[19]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Path Creation as a Process of Resource Alignment and Anchoring: Industry Formation for On-Site Water Recycling in Beijing , 2016 .

[20]  S. Manning,et al.  Convincing the crowd: Entrepreneurial storytelling in crowdfunding campaigns , 2016 .

[21]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases , 2016 .

[22]  B. Truffer,et al.  Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy - A framework and a case study on biogas technology , 2016 .

[23]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field. , 2015 .

[24]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Empowering sustainable niches: Comparing UK and Dutch offshore wind developments , 2015 .

[25]  Jan Schoormans,et al.  How actors can influence the legitimation of new consumer product categories: A theoretical framework , 2015 .

[26]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Policy activism and regional path creation: the promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland , 2015 .

[27]  H. Normann.  The role of politics in sustainable transitions: The rise and decline of offshore wind in Norway , 2015 .

[28]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: the case of UK energy policy , 2014 .

[29]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Entrepreneurial Storytelling, Future Expectations, and the Paradox of Legitimacy , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[30]  M. Steen,et al.  Path creation in a single-industry town: The case of Verdal and Windcluster Mid-Norway , 2014 .

[31]  Stuart Dawley,et al.  Creating New Paths? Offshore Wind, Policy Activism, and Peripheral Region Development , 2014 .

[32]  M. Bradshaw.  Global Energy Dilemmas: Energy Security, Globalization, and Climate Change , 2013 .

[33]  Adrian Smith,et al.  From Laggard to Leader: Explaining Offshore Wind Developments in the UK , 2013 .

[34]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[35]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[36]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies , 2012 .

[37]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[38]  J. Peck,et al.  Variegated capitalism , 2007 .

[39]  V. Lauber,et al.  Anglo-Saxon and German approaches to neoliberalism and environmental policy: The case of financing renewable energy , 2007 .

[40]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[41]  V. Schmidt.  Democracy in Europe: The Impact of European Integration , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[42]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[43]  K. Cox.  The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth , 1991 .

[44]  Asbjørn Karlsen.  Framing industrialization of the offshore wind value chain – A discourse approach to an event , 2018 .

[45]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change , 2011 .

[46]  R. Jessop.  Varieties of Capitalism. , 2006 .