COLLABORATION IN RESEARCH

[1]  Markus Simeth,et al.  How do firms develop capabilities for scientific disclosure , 2015 .

[2]  B. Martin,et al.  The benefits from publicly funded research , 2007 .

[3]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises , 1996, Scientometrics.

[4]  H. Small,et al.  Identifying emerging topics in science and technology , 2014 .

[5]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The effect of university–industry collaboration on the scientific impact of publications: the Canadian case, 1980–2005 , 2008 .

[6]  Manuel Fernández-Esquinas,et al.  Measuring university–industry collaboration in a regional innovation system , 2010, Scientometrics.

[7]  A. F. J. VAN RAAN,et al.  In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much , 1998, Scientometrics.

[8]  Daniel L. Fay,et al.  Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art , 2012, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[9]  Bo Jarneving,et al.  A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front , 2005, Scientometrics.

[10]  Yin Li,et al.  Why do technology firms publish scientific papers? The strategic use of science by small and midsize enterprises in nanotechnology , 2015 .

[11]  M. Balconi,et al.  University–industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics , 2006 .

[12]  Marco Caliendo,et al.  Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[14]  Petr Hanel,et al.  Industry–University Collaboration by Canadian Manufacturing Firms* , 2006 .

[15]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .

[16]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties , 1974 .

[17]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property , 1988, Isis.

[18]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[19]  M. Perkmann,et al.  The Two Faces of Collaboration: Impacts of University-Industry Relations on Public Research , 2009 .

[20]  Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .

[21]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[22]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[23]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Enterprise-University Co-operation and the Role of Public Research Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems , 1999 .

[24]  Diana Lucio-Arias,et al.  An indicator of research front activity: Measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Doris Schartinger,et al.  Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria , 2001 .

[26]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[27]  Diana Hicks,et al.  How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model , 1997, Scientometrics.

[28]  G. Laudel,et al.  The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations , 2007 .

[29]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  University-industry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination , 2009, ArXiv.

[30]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  University-Industry Cooperation in the Context of the European Framework Programmes , 2001 .