A comparative assessment of climate change impacts on drought over Korea based on multiple climate projections and multiple drought indices

This study assesses future changes in drought characteristics in response to different emission scenarios over Korea based on multiple climate projections and multiple drought indices. To better resolve regional climate details and enhance confidence in future changes, multi-model projections are dynamically downscaled, and their systematic biases are statistically removed. Bias-corrected climate data are directly used to calculate the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI), and they are fed into a hydrological model to generate runoff used for the calculation of the standardized runoff index (SRI). The analysis is focused on changes in the frequencies and severities of severe or extreme droughts measured by the SPI, SPEI, and SRI for the Han River and Nakdong River basins. Fine-scale ensemble projections reveal robust changes in temperatures that monotonically respond to emission forcings, whereas precipitation changes show rather inconsistent patterns across models and scenarios. Temperature and precipitation shifts lead to changes in evapotranspiration (ET) and runoff, which modulate the drought characteristics. In general, the SPEI shows the most robust pattern with significant increases in both drought frequency and severity. This result is mainly due to the excessive potential ET that is hypothetically estimated without considering water availability. While the SPI based on only precipitation exhibits behavior different from that of the SPEI, the SRI that considers actual ET produces an intermediate level of changes between the SPI and SPEI. Compared to the large uncertainty of the frequency changes that overwhelm the change signal due to inconsistency across models and indices, the severity of future drought is likely to be exacerbated with enhanced confidence.

[1]  K. Kumar,et al.  Comparison of Penman and Thornthwaite methods of estimating potential evapotranspiration for Indian conditions , 1987 .

[2]  H. Panitz,et al.  Climate change projections for CORDEX-Africa with COSMO-CLM regional climate model and differences with the driving global climate models , 2016, Climate Dynamics.

[3]  Song‐You Hong,et al.  Projections of high resolution climate changes for South Korea using multiple-regional climate models based on four RCP scenarios. Part 1: surface air temperature , 2016, Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences.

[4]  B. Soden,et al.  Atmospheric Warming and the Amplification of Precipitation Extremes , 2008, Science.

[5]  H. Moradkhani,et al.  A comparative assessment of projected meteorological and hydrological droughts: Elucidating the role of temperature , 2017 .

[6]  H. Kwon,et al.  Influence of evapotranspiration on future drought risk using bivariate drought frequency curves , 2016 .

[7]  Shih-Chieh Kao,et al.  A multi-model and multi-index evaluation of drought characteristics in the 21st century , 2015 .

[8]  L. Sushama,et al.  The role of temperature in drought projections over North America , 2014, Climatic Change.

[9]  M. Pulido‐Velazquez,et al.  Combined use of relative drought indices to analyze climate change impact on meteorological and hydrological droughts in a Mediterranean basin , 2017 .

[10]  A. Dai.  Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models , 2013 .

[11]  Deg-Hyo Bae,et al.  Possible change in Korean streamflow seasonality based on multi‐model climate projections , 2013 .

[12]  N. Diffenbaugh,et al.  Higher Hydroclimatic Intensity with Global Warming , 2011 .

[13]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Hydrologic uncertainties in climate change from IPCC AR4 GCM simulations of the Chungju Basin, Korea , 2011 .

[14]  A. Koutroulis,et al.  The impact of climate change on hydrometeorological droughts at a basin scale , 2013 .

[15]  P. Willems,et al.  Seasonally varying footprint of climate change on precipitation in the Middle East , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[16]  S. Vicente‐Serrano,et al.  A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index , 2009 .

[17]  J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Evaluation of the mean and extreme precipitation regimes from the ENSEMBLES regional climate multimodel simulations over Spain , 2010 .

[18]  Chang-Joo Kim,et al.  A multimodel assessment of the climate change effect on the drought severity–duration–frequency relationship , 2013 .

[19]  J. Christensen,et al.  Improved confidence in regional climate model simulations of precipitation evaluated using drought statistics from the ENSEMBLES models , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[20]  S. Vicente‐Serrano,et al.  Standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) revisited: parameter fitting, evapotranspiration models, tools, datasets and drought monitoring , 2014 .

[21]  J. Oh,et al.  Response of global warming on regional climate change over Korea: An experiment with the MM5 model , 2004 .

[22]  D. Bae,et al.  Utilization of the Bayesian Method to Improve Hydrological Drought Prediction Accuracy , 2017, Water Resources Management.

[23]  D. Bae,et al.  Added value of dynamical downscaling for hydrological projections in the Chungju Basin, Korea , 2018, International Journal of Climatology.

[24]  C. W. Thornthwaite.  An Approach Toward a Rational Classification of Climate , 1948 .

[25]  D. Elsworth,et al.  The Impact of Frictional Healing on Stick‐Slip Recurrence Interval and Stress Drop: Implications for Earthquake Scaling , 2017 .

[26]  J. Rhee,et al.  A drought index based on actual evapotranspiration from the Bouchet hypothesis , 2016 .

[27]  B. Brown,et al.  Multiyear Droughts and Pluvials over the Upper Colorado River Basin and Associated Circulations , 2017 .

[28]  Simon Dadson,et al.  Bias correction of daily precipitation simulated by a regional climate model: a comparison of methods , 2013 .

[29]  D. Lüthi,et al.  Dynamical downscaling of CMIP5 global circulation models over CORDEX-Africa with COSMO-CLM: evaluation over the present climate and analysis of the added value , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[30]  C. W. Thornthwaite.  An approach toward a rational classification of climate. , 1948 .

[31]  J. Evans,et al.  How does bias correction of regional climate model precipitation affect modelled runoff , 2015 .

[32]  Song‐You Hong,et al.  Projections of high resolution climate changes for South Korea using multiple-regional climate models based on four RCP scenarios. Part 2: precipitation , 2016, Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences.

[33]  Seok-Geun Oh,et al.  Changes in seasonal and diurnal precipitation types during summer over South Korea in the late twenty-first century (2081–2100) projected by the RegCM4.0 based on four RCP scenarios , 2018, Climate Dynamics.

[34]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[35]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility , 2013 .

[36]  J. Rhee,et al.  Future Changes in Drought Characteristics: Regional Analysis for South Korea under CMIP5 Projections , 2016 .

[37]  D. Bae,et al.  Drought analysis according to shifting of climate zones to arid climate zone over Asia monsoon region , 2015 .

[38]  Heejun Chang,et al.  Climate change impacts on spatial patterns in drought risk in the Willamette River Basin, Oregon, USA , 2012, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[39]  Ravinesh C. Deo,et al.  Drought prediction till 2100 under RCP 8.5 climate change scenarios for Korea , 2015 .

[40]  Kai Duan,et al.  Comparison of Meteorological, Hydrological and Agricultural Drought Responses to Climate Change and Uncertainty Assessment , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[41]  E. Im,et al.  An assessment of future dryness over Korea based on the ECHAM5-RegCM3 model chain under A1B emission scenario , 2012, Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences.

[42]  T. McKee,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF DROUGHT FREQUENCY AND DURATION TO TIME SCALES , 1993 .

[43]  E. Im,et al.  Robust intensification of hydroclimatic intensity over East Asia from multi-model ensemble regional projections , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[44]  B. Soden,et al.  Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming , 2006 .

[45]  Joo‐Heon Lee,et al.  Analysis of climate change impacts on the spatial and frequency patterns of drought using a potential drought hazard mapping approach , 2014 .

[46]  Qiuhong Tang,et al.  Climate change impacts on meteorological, agricultural and hydrological droughts in China , 2015 .

[47]  J. Seibert,et al.  Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods , 2012 .

[48]  E. Im,et al.  Regional climate projection over South Korea simulated by the HadGEM2-AO and WRF model chain under RCP emission scenarios , 2015 .

[49]  F. Giorgi,et al.  A consistent picture of the hydroclimatic response to global warming from multiple indices: Models and observations , 2014 .

[50]  E. Im,et al.  Worsening of Heat Stress Due To Global Warming in South Korea Based on Multi‐RCM Ensemble Projections , 2017 .

[51]  M. Svoboda,et al.  Centennial drought outlook over the CONUS using NASA‐NEX downscaled climate ensemble , 2017 .

[52]  H. Douville,et al.  Evaluation of drought indices at interannual to climate change timescales: a case study over the Amazon and Mississippi river basins , 2012 .

[53]  S. Shukla,et al.  Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought , 2008 .

[54]  C. Piani,et al.  Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe , 2010 .