Probing Signal Design for Power System Identification

This paper investigates the design of effective input signals for low-level probing of power systems. In 2005, 2006, and 2008 the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) conducted four large-scale system-wide tests of the western interconnected power system where probing signals were injected by modulating the control signal at the Celilo end of the Pacific DC intertie. A major objective of these tests is the accurate estimation of the inter-area electromechanical modes. A key aspect of any such test is the design of an effective probing signal that leads to measured outputs rich in information about the modes. This paper specifically studies low-level probing signal design for power-system identification. The paper describes the design methodology and the advantages of this new probing signal which was successfully applied during these tests. This probing input is a multi-sine signal with its frequency content focused in the range of the inter-area modes. The period of the signal is over 2 min providing high-frequency resolution. Up to 15 cycles of the signal are injected resulting in a processing gain of 15. The resulting system response is studied in the time and frequency domains. Because of the new probing signal characteristics, these results show significant improvement in the output SNR compared to previous tests.

[1]  Graham Rogers,et al.  Power System Oscillations , 1999 .

[2]  Daniel J. Trudnowski,et al.  Initial results in electromechanical mode identification from ambient data , 1997 .

[3]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[4]  J. F. Hauer,et al.  Initial results in Prony analysis of power system response signals , 1990 .

[5]  W.A. Mittelstadt,et al.  Use of the WECC WAMS in Wide-Area Probing Tests for Validation of System Performance and Modeling , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Ning Zhou,et al.  Initial results in power system identification from injected probing signals using a subspace method , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  J. Schoukens,et al.  Peak factor minimization using a time-frequency domain swapping algorithm , 1988 .

[8]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[9]  R. L. Cresap,et al.  Operating Experience with Modulation of the Pacific HVDC Intertie , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[10]  J. W. Pierre,et al.  Use of ARMA Block Processing for Estimating Stationary Low-Frequency Electromechanical Modes of Power Systems , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[11]  J.W. Pierre,et al.  Bootstrap-based confidence interval estimates for electromechanical modes from multiple output analysis of measured ambient data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Ning Zhou,et al.  Performance of Three Mode-Meter Block-Processing Algorithms for Automated Dynamic Stability Assessment , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  D.J. Trudnowski,et al.  Use of ARMA block processing for estimating stationary low-frequency electromechanical modes of power systems , 2003, 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491).

[14]  Ning Zhou,et al.  Robust RLS methods for on-line estimation of power system electromechanical modes , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[15]  D.J. Trudnowski,et al.  A Perspective on WAMS Analysis Tools for Tracking of Oscillatory Dynamics , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.