The effect of format on performance: Editing text in print versus digital formats

In light of the present-day proliferation of digital texts and the increase in situations that require active digital text reading in learning, it is becoming increasingly important to shed light on the comparison between print and digital reading under active reading conditions. In this study, the active reading abilities of 93 university students (83% females) were examined. Participants were asked to read, edit, recognize errors and improve the quality of short papers (600 words each) on the topic of environmental awareness, in both print and in digital formats. Surprisingly, and in contrast to many recent reports about print versus digital reading, no significant differences were found between the performances of participants in the two formats. Similarly, no significant differences were found for all categories of text errors as well as for gender. It was found that the digital readers completed their tasks faster than the print readers but their performance was not lower. Results of this study have important implications for the current debate in higher education concerning the use of digital text for learning and for designing, reviewing and editing academic works. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Niv Ahituv,et al.  A Systematic Approach Toward Assessing the Value of an Information System , 1980, MIS Q..

[2]  Jason E. Albrecht,et al.  Updating a mental model: maintaining both local and global coherence , 1993 .

[3]  Dale S. Niederhauser,et al.  The Influence of Cognitive Load on Learning from Hypertext , 2000 .

[4]  Jean-François Rouet.  Guest editorial: hypermedia and learning - cognitive perspectives , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[5]  David A. Griffith,et al.  The Role of Interface in Electronic Commerce: Consumer Involvement with Print Versus On-Line Catalogs , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[6]  Gary J. Brown,et al.  Beyond print: reading digitally , 2001 .

[7]  Nila A Sathe,et al.  Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[8]  Pål Gulbrandsen,et al.  Paper or screen, mother tongue or English: which is better? A randomized trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[9]  James Hartley.  Is Judging Text On Screen Different From Judging Text In Print? A Naturalistic E-Mail Experiment , 2002 .

[10]  K. T. L. Vaughan.  Changing use patterns of print journals in the digital age: Impacts of electronic equivalents on print chemistry journal use , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Effects of Online Reading on Popular Science Comprehension , 2003 .

[12]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Interruptions, Task Complexity, and Information Presentation on Computer-Supported Decision-Making Performance , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[13]  Kate J. Garland,et al.  CRT monitors: Do they interfere with learning? , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Helen Sharp,et al.  Navigation and Ownership for Learning in Electronic Texts: An Experimental Study. , 2004 .

[15]  Evelyn J. S. Hovenga,et al.  Information literacy - what it is about?: Literature review of the concept and the context , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[16]  Nicolas Guéguen,et al.  The emergence of the contextual role of the e-book in cognitive processes through an ecological and functional analysis , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Ziming Liu,et al.  Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years , 2005, J. Documentation.

[18]  David Reinking,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning of Reading , 2005 .

[19]  M. Prensky.  Listen to the Natives. , 2006 .

[20]  Kathryn Ley,et al.  A Learning Strategy to Compensate for Cognitive Overload in Online Learning: Learner Use of Printed Online Materials , 2006 .

[21]  Terje Hillesund.  Reading Books in the Digital Age subsequent to Amazon, Google and the long tail , 2007, First Monday.

[22]  Yoram Eshet-Alkalai,et al.  Does the medium affect the message? The influence of text representation format on critical thinking , 2007 .

[23]  Yoram Eshet,et al.  Living Books: The Incidental Bonus of Playing with Multimedia. , 2007 .

[24]  John Lam,et al.  Usability and usefulness of eBooks on PPCs: How students' opinions vary over time , 2009 .

[25]  DeAnna M. Laverick,et al.  Digital Textbooks: The Next Paradigm Shift in Higher Education? , 2009 .

[26]  Yoram Eshet,et al.  Changes Over Time in Digital Literacy , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[27]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts , 2009 .

[28]  Brian Whitworth,et al.  Reinventing Academic Publishing Online. Part II: A Socio-technical Vision , 2009, First Monday.

[29]  Terje Hillesund.  Digital Reading Spaces: How Expert Readers handle Books, the Web and Electronic Paper , 2010, First Monday.

[30]  Yoram Eshet-Alkalai,et al.  Does the medium affect the message? The effect of congruent versus incongruent display on critical reading , 2010 .

[31]  M Castillo,et al.  E-Readers and E-Paper , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[32]  Florin D. Salajan,et al.  Student and faculty inter-generational digital divide: Fact or fiction? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Eran Chajut,et al.  You Can Teach Old Dogs New Tricks : The Factors That Affect Changes over Time in Digital Literacy , 2010 .

[34]  R. Eynon,et al.  Digital natives: where is the evidence? , 2010 .

[35]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  The imposition and superimposition of digital reading technology: the academic potential of e-readers , 2011, CHI.

[36]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  Metacognitive regulation of text learning: on screen versus on paper. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.