Reliable message delivery for mobile agents: push or pull?

Two of the fundamental issues in designing protocols for message passing between mobile agents (MAs) are tracking the migration of the target agent and forwarding messages to it. Even with an ideal fault-free network-transport mechanism, messages can be dropped during MA migration. Therefore, in order to provide reliable message delivery, protocols need to overcome message loss caused by asynchronous operations of agent migration and message forwarding. In this paper, two known message forwarding approaches, namely push and pull, are explored to design adaptive and reliable message delivery protocols. Based on a commonly used MA tracking model, the pros and cons of these two approaches are evaluated, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The comparative performance evaluation is presented in terms of network traffic and delay in message processing. We also propose improvements to the pull approach to reduce network traffic and the message delay. We conclude that with different message passing and migration patterns and varying requirements of real-time message processing, specific applications can select different message delivery approaches to achieve the desired level of performance and flexibility.

[1]  Prashant J. Shenoy,et al.  Adaptive Push-Pull: Disseminating Dynamic Web Data , 2002, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[2]  M. Hatori,et al.  Tracking agent: a new way of communication in a multi-agent environment , 1997, Proceedings of ICUPC 97 - 6th International Conference on Universal Personal Communications.

[3]  Ahmed Karmouch,et al.  Mobile software agents: an overview , 1998, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[4]  Louise E. Moser,et al.  MAgNET: Mobile Agents for Networked Electronic Trading , 1999, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[5]  Danny B. Lange,et al.  Seven good reasons for mobile agents , 1999, CACM.

[6]  Amotz Bar-Noy,et al.  Mobile users: To update or not to update? , 1994, Proceedings of INFOCOM '94 Conference on Computer Communications.

[7]  Stanley B. Zdonik,et al.  Balancing push and pull for data broadcast , 1997, SIGMOD '97.

[8]  Doug Montgomery,et al.  A Reliable Message Delivery Protocol for Mobile Agents , 2000, ASA/MA.

[9]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Cooperating Mobile Agents for Dynamic Network Routing , 1999 .

[10]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support , 1996, RFC.

[11]  Danny B. Lange,et al.  Programming and Deploying Java¿ Mobile Agents with Aglets¿ , 1998 .

[12]  S. Sitharama Iyengar,et al.  Multiresolution data integration using mobile agents in distributed sensor networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[13]  Amy L. Murphy,et al.  Reliable Communication for Highly Mobile Agents , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[14]  Timothy K. Shih,et al.  Agent communication network-a mobile agent computation model for Internet applications , 1999, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Computers and Communications (Cat. No.PR00250).

[15]  Prashant J. Shenoy,et al.  Adaptive push-pull: disseminating dynamic web data , 2001, WWW '01.

[16]  Victor C. M. Leung,et al.  Location management for next-generation personal communications networks , 2000, IEEE Netw..

[17]  Jiannong Cao Mailbox-Based Scheme for Mobile Agent Communications , 2001 .

[18]  Jiannong Cao,et al.  Checkpointing and rollback of wide-area distributed applications using mobile agents , 2001, Proceedings 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2001.

[19]  Jiannong Cao,et al.  An Efficient Mailbox-Based Algorithm for Message Delivery in Mobile Agent Systems , 2001, Mobile Agents.