A non-linear ultrasonic scattering approach for micro bubble concentration quantification

Ultrasonic imaging of microbubble contrast agents and their concentration quantification is an ongoing problem, complicated by the lack of accurate attenuation compensation (TGC) algorithms and by the complex behaviour of microbubbles. Indeed the ultrasound contrast agents behave non linearly in the power range for medical imaging, while the biological tissues behave mainly linearly. Such quantification is required to allow the physicians to estimate the local blood perfusion in the biological tissues. But the different imaging methods developed to distinguish the agent from the surrounding tissues do not give an accurate representation of local agent concentration, which therefore has to be qualitatively estimated by the physicians. In this paper, we expand an existing automatic attenuation compensation algorithm by introducing a nonlinear relationship between insonating power and scattering when medium acoustic pressure is used (0.33 MI - 0.52 MI at 3 MHz), and model amplitude modulation (AM). An acquisition system is set up to allow acquisitions of radio frequency data from Sonovuereg suspension with a programmable ultrasound scanner and a sectorial probe. Results show that the behaviour of microbubble clouds with pressure and concentration follow the evolution expected from the assumptions formulated to be able to develop the model. In particular, the proposed equations for concentration estimation correctly predict the true concentration in the range [0-228] muL/L.

[1]  W N McDicken,et al.  An in vitro comparison of ultrasonic contrast agents in solutions with varying air levels. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  Meng-Xing Tang,et al.  Frequency and pressure dependent attenuation and scattering by microbubbles. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  P. Phillips,et al.  Contrast pulse sequences (CPS): imaging nonlinear microbubbles , 2001, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263).

[4]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Basic Acoustic Properties of Microbubbles , 2002, Echocardiography.

[5]  Meng-Xing Tang,et al.  Pressure-dependent attenuation with microbubbles at low mechanical index. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  D. Adam,et al.  Time and pressure dependence of acoustic signals radiated from microbubbles. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  P. Ask,et al.  Modelling of nonlinear effects and the response of ultrasound contrast micro bubbles: simulation and experiment. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[8]  Michael S. Hughes,et al.  Frequency and concentration dependence of the backscatter coefficient of the ultrasound contrast agent Albunex , 1998 .

[9]  R. Eckersley,et al.  Optimising phase and amplitude modulation schemes for imaging microbubble contrast agents at low acoustic power. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  F. Duck,et al.  Automatic attenuation compensation for ultrasonic imaging. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.