Shape Classification Using Wasserstein Distance for Brain Morphometry Analysis

Brain morphometry study plays a fundamental role in medical imaging analysis and diagnosis. This work proposes a novel framework for brain cortical surface classification using Wasserstein distance, based on uniformization theory and Riemannian optimal mass transport theory. By Poincare uniformization theorem, all shapes can be conformally deformed to one of the three canonical spaces: the unit sphere, the Euclidean plane or the hyperbolic plane. The uniformization map will distort the surface area elements. The area-distortion factor gives a probability measure on the canonical uniformization space. All the probability measures on a Riemannian manifold form the Wasserstein space. Given any 2 probability measures, there is a unique optimal mass transport map between them, the transportation cost defines the Wasserstein distance between them. Wasserstein distance gives a Riemannian metric for the Wasserstein space. It intrinsically measures the dissimilarities between shapes and thus has the potential for shape classification. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first. work to introduce the optimal mass transport map to general Riemannian manifolds. The method is based on geodesic power Voronoi diagram. Comparing to the conventional methods, our approach solely depends on Riemannian metrics and is invariant under rigid motions and scalings, thus it intrinsically measures shape distance. Experimental results on classifying brain cortical surfaces with different intelligence quotients demonstrated the efficiency and efficacy of our method.

[1]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Elastic Geodesic Paths in Shape Space of Parameterized Surfaces , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  3D Shape Histograms for Similarity Search and Classification in Spatial Databases , 1999, SSD.

[3]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Measuring and comparing brain cortical surface area and other areal quantities , 2012, NeuroImage.

[4]  Shing-Tung Yau,et al.  Geometric Compression Using Riemann Surface Structure , 2003, Commun. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Shing-Tung Yau,et al.  Computational Conformal Geometry , 2016 .

[6]  Shi-Qing Xin,et al.  Intrinsic computation of centroidal Voronoi tessellation (CVT) on meshes , 2015, Comput. Aided Des..

[7]  Soon Beom Hong,et al.  Fractal dimension in human cortical surface: Multiple regression analysis with cortical thickness, sulcal depth, and folding area , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Taku Komura,et al.  Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[9]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Kiralee M. Hayashi,et al.  Dynamics of Gray Matter Loss in Alzheimer's Disease , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Christoph Schnörr,et al.  Object Segmentation by Shape Matching with Wasserstein Modes , 2013, EMMCVPR.

[12]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  Shape distributions , 2002, TOGS.

[13]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Multi-scale interest regions from unorganized point clouds , 2008, 2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.

[14]  Gustavo K. Rohde,et al.  A Linear Optimal Transportation Framework for Quantifying and Visualizing Variations in Sets of Images , 2012, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Xianfeng Gu,et al.  Discrete Surface Ricci Flow , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Y. Brenier Polar Factorization and Monotone Rearrangement of Vector-Valued Functions , 1991 .

[17]  C. Villani Topics in Optimal Transportation , 2003 .

[18]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Elastic Shape Matching of Parameterized Surfaces Using Square Root Normal Fields , 2012, ECCV.

[19]  Lalit M. Patnaik,et al.  Classification of magnetic resonance brain images using wavelets as input to support vector machine and neural network , 2006, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[20]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Shape Analysis of Elastic Curves in Euclidean Spaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[21]  Stefano Soatto,et al.  Shape Matching Using Multiscale Integral Invariants , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  Laurent Younes,et al.  Spaces and manifolds of shapes in computer vision: An overview , 2012, Image Vis. Comput..

[23]  Nicolas Bonnotte,et al.  From Knothe's Rearrangement to Brenier's Optimal Transport Map , 2012, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[24]  U. Yoon,et al.  Prediction for human intelligence using morphometric characteristics of cortical surface: Partial least square analysis , 2013, Neuroscience.

[25]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Positive correlations between corpus callosum thickness and intelligence , 2007, NeuroImage.

[26]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Three-dimensional point cloud recognition via distributions of geometric distances , 2009, Graph. Model..

[27]  Eileen Luders,et al.  Mapping the relationship between cortical convolution and intelligence: effects of gender. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Anderson M. Winkler,et al.  Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies , 2010, NeuroImage.