Imaging speech production using fMRI

Human speech is a well-learned, sensorimotor, and ecological behavior ideal for the study of neural processes and brain-behavior relations. With the advent of modern neuroimaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the potential for investigating neural mechanisms of speech motor control, speech motor disorders, and speech motor development has increased. However, a practical issue has limited the application of fMRI to issues in spoken language production and other related behaviors (singing, swallowing). Producing these behaviors during volume acquisition introduces motion-induced signal changes that confound the activation signals of interest. A number of approaches, ranging from signal processing to using silent or covert speech, have attempted to remove or prevent the effects of motion-induced artefact. However, these approaches are flawed for a variety of reasons. An alternative approach, that has only recently been applied to study single-word production, uses pauses in volume acquisition during the production of natural speech motion. Here we present some representative data illustrating the problems associated with motion artefacts and some qualitative results acquired from subjects producing short sentences and orofacial nonspeech movements in the scanner. Using pauses or silent intervals in volume acquisition and block designs, results from individual subjects result in robust activation without motion-induced signal artefact. This approach is an efficient method for studying the neural basis of spoken language production and the effects of speech and language disorders using fMRI.

[1]  G I de Zubicaray,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture‐word paradigm: An event‐related fMRI study employing overt responses , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[2]  W Grodd,et al.  Opposite hemispheric lateralization effects during speaking and singing at motor cortex, insula and cerebellum , 2000, Neuroreport.

[3]  R W Cox,et al.  Real‐time 3D image registration for functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[5]  S Grootoonk,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during volitional expiration in man: a comparison with volitional inspiration. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Clinicoanatomic studies in dysarthria: review, critique, and directions for research. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  Michael J Brammer,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of verbal fluency and confrontation naming using compressed image acquisition to permit overt responses , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[8]  W. Grodd,et al.  Differential Contributions of Motor Cortex, Basal Ganglia, and Cerebellum to Speech Motor Control: Effects of Syllable Repetition Rate Evaluated by fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Overt Verbal Responding during fMRI Scanning: Empirical Investigations of Problems and Potential Solutions , 1999, NeuroImage.

[11]  R W Cox,et al.  Event‐related fMRI of tasks involving brief motion , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  U Klose,et al.  Functional lateralization of speech production at primary motor cortex: a fMRI study. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A General Statistical Analysis for fMRI Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[16]  Wolfgang Grodd,et al.  Hemispheric Lateralization Effects of Rhythm Implementation during Syllable Repetitions: An fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  H. E. Brown,et al.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior interleaved gradients technique , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  W. Grodd,et al.  Does the cerebellum contribute to cognitive aspects of speech production? A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study in humans , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  K. Sakai,et al.  Brain activations during conscious self‐monitoring of speech production with delayed auditory feedback: An fMRI study , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[20]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[21]  R W Cox,et al.  Magnetic field changes in the human brain due to swallowing or speaking , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  What dysarthrias can tell us about the neural control of speech , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[23]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Cerebral regions associated with verbal response initiation, suppression and strategy use , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading , 1995 .

[25]  Takao Kawasaki,et al.  Analysis of brain activity during clenching by fMRI. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[26]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Brain activity during reading. The effects of exposure duration and task. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  T. Carr,et al.  Comparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event‐related fMRI , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[28]  A. Thron,et al.  Movement Artefacts and MR BOLD Signal Increase During Different Paradigms for Mapping the Sensorimotor Cortex , 2002, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[29]  U. Jürgens Neural pathways underlying vocal control , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[30]  J A Fiez,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of speech an overview of techniques and methodological approaches. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.