An Integrative Model of the Role of Trust in Transactive Memory Development

This article extends transactive memory (TM) theory as it is currently conceptualized. We propose a new integrative model of the relationship between transactive memory system (TMS) development and trust. By using the TM encoding cycle, the model proposes that trust acts as an antecedent of TMSs and that wider perceptions of team members’ trustworthiness (benevolence and integrity) also affect the development and maintenance of effective TMSs in teams. Our conceptualization considers the effect of trust on both the knowledge structure and the transactive processes involved in TMSs. From our analysis, we provide a number of propositions and hypotheses relating to different stages of TMS development to be pursued by future research. Finally, we consider the managerial implications of our model.

[1]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Kathleen Boies,et al.  Antecedents Of Trust: Establishing A Boundary Condition For The Relation Between Propensity To Trust And Intention To Trust , 2005 .

[3]  A. Edmondson Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams , 2003 .

[4]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[5]  A. Hollingshead Perceptions of Expertise and Transactive Memory in Work Relationships , 2000 .

[6]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  R. Cattell The scientific analysis of personality , 1970 .

[9]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[10]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Fred O. Walumbwa,et al.  Moderating Role of Follower Characteristics With Transformational Leadership and Follower Work Engagement , 2009 .

[12]  P. Curșeu,et al.  Does conflict shatter trust or does trust obliterate conflict? Revisiting the relationships between team diversity, conflict, and trust , 2010 .

[13]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[14]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[15]  John Byrne,et al.  Knowledge Networks in New Product Development Projects: A Transactive Memory Perspective , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Diane Liang Rulke,et al.  Investigating the Encoding Process of Transactive Memory Development in Group Training , 2000 .

[17]  B. Mullen,et al.  Theories of group behavior , 1987 .

[18]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[19]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy , 1998 .

[20]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[22]  Melanie Ashleigh,et al.  Enhancing trust through training , 2011 .

[23]  Paul D. Johnson,et al.  Organizational Justice, Trustworthiness, and Trust: A Multifoci Examination , 2010 .

[24]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  The reciprocal nature of trust: A longitudinal study of interacting teams. , 2005 .

[25]  Dale E. Zand Trust and Managerial Problem Solving , 1972 .

[26]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Trust as an Organizing Principle , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Rob Cross,et al.  Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: the moderating impact of relationship length. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Bart de Jong,et al.  Beyond shared perceptions of trust and monitoring in teams: implications of asymmetry and dissensus. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  M. Ashleigh,et al.  Contemporary Management: European Edition , 1997 .

[30]  Brian E. Mennecke,et al.  Teams and Tasks , 2003 .

[31]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[32]  Hannu Vanharanta,et al.  Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context , 2003 .

[33]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[34]  A. Hollingshead Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[35]  Xin Li,et al.  Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[36]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[37]  D. Wegner,et al.  Cognitive interdependence in close relationships , 1985 .

[38]  John D. Politis The connection between trust and knowledge management: what are its implications for team performance , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[39]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1993 THE CONTRIBUTION OF SHARED KNOWLEDGE TO IS GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2017 .

[40]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems: Current Issues and Future Research Directions , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Kyle Lewis Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  Devaki Rau The Influence of Relationship Conflict and Trust on the Transactive Memory , 2005 .

[43]  Ronald J. Karren,et al.  An Examination of the Roles of Trust and Functional Diversity on Virtual Team Performance Ratings , 2009 .

[44]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[45]  Lewis A. Bizo,et al.  Evaluating the effects of team-skills training on subjective workload , 2011 .

[46]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  The Influence of Demographic Heterogeneity on the Emergence and Consequences of Cooperative Norms in Work Teams , 2001 .

[47]  Melanie J. Ashleigh,et al.  The Effects of Team-Skills Training on Transactive Memory and Performance , 2007 .

[48]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[49]  Claus W. Langfred Too Much of a Good Thing? Negative Effects of High Trust and Individual Autonomy in Self-Managing Teams , 2004 .

[50]  Aneil Mishra ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO CRISIS: THE CENTRALITY OF TRUST , 1996 .

[51]  K. Dirks Trust in leadership and team performance: evidence from NCAA basketball. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Edward C. Tomlinson,et al.  Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions , 2006 .

[53]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time , 2007, MIS Q..

[54]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 2 of 2: A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[55]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[56]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries , 2001 .

[57]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[58]  Leon Mann,et al.  Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance , 2010 .

[59]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Perspective - Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[61]  Vesa Peltokorpi,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems , 2008 .

[62]  John R. Austin Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  Jeffrey C. Kohles,et al.  Can I Trust You to Trust Me? , 2007 .

[64]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[65]  W. Ickes Compatible and Incompatible Relationships , 2012 .

[66]  Peggy M. Beranek,et al.  A Comparison of Relational and Trust Training Techniques for Virtual Team Communication: How Much Training is Enough? , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[67]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future , 2007 .

[68]  Petru Lucian Curseu,et al.  Emergent states in virtual teams: a complex adaptive systems perspective , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[69]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[70]  Felix C. Brodbeck,et al.  Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model. , 2007 .

[71]  D. Wegner A Computer Network Model of Human Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[72]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Emotional Intelligence and Trust in Formal Mentoring Programs , 2010 .

[73]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[74]  T. Elfring,et al.  How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. , 2010 .

[75]  Michael E. Enzle,et al.  Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. , 1993 .

[76]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[77]  R. Grover,et al.  From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[78]  Jeffrey C. Kohles,et al.  It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships , 2008 .