Life cycle assessments of consumer electronics — are they consistent?

Background, aim, and scopeDuring the last decades, the electronics industry has undergone tremendous changes due to intense research leading to advanced technology development. Multiple life cycle assessment (LCA) studies have been performed on the environmental implications of consumer electronics. The aim of this review is to assess the consistency between different LCA studies for desktop computers, laptop computers, mobile phones and televisions (TVs).Materials and methodsA literature study was conducted covering some key LCA contributions to the consumer electronics field. The focus is primarily on global warming potential during 100 years (GWP100) efficiency in different life cycle phases and secondarily on primary energy usage/electricity usages which are normalised per year to find inconsistencies.ResultsThe life cycle impact assessment GWP100 results for consumer electronics over the years suggest that most studies are of comparable quality; however, some studies are neither coherent nor transparent. Published LCAs for mobile phone and TV sets are consistent, whereas for laptop and desktop computers, the studies occasionally give conflicting messages.DiscussionThe inconsistencies appear to be rooted in subjective choices and different system boundaries and lifetime, rather than lack of standardisation. If included, the amounts of emissions of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) are crucial to the GWP100 in the various life cycle phases for a desktop using liquid crystal display (LCD) screen. Another important observation is that the MEEuP methodology report/tool underestimates the GWP100 of electronic component manufacturing processes.ConclusionsBetween 1997 and 2010, the ISO 14040/44 standards have ensured a rather consistent set of GWP100 results for the studied products. However, the lack of transparency for consumer electronics LCAs sometimes makes benchmarking difficult. It is nevertheless possible to compare new LCA calculations to existing studies. It is also possible to reveal which product studies are consistent with studies of submaterials and subcomponents. In most cases, the GWP100 results for consumer electronics are consistent. Based on the survey of published work, recycling and other end-of-life processes have a tiny share of the total GWP100 score for consumer electronics.Recommendations and perspectivesLCA researchers should as a rule, if possible, make a historical survey of their technical system to establish trends, proportions and relations. Policy makers ought to ask for these surveys when using LCAs for decision support. This charter is necessary as to understand the reasonableness of the results. Additions to the ISO14040/44 LCA standardisation for mass–volume products would be worthwhile as a means of increasing the consistency.

[1]  Hang-Sik Shin,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of a Personal Computer and its Effective Recycling Rate (7 pp) , 2006 .

[2]  Rita Puig,et al.  LCA and ecodesign in the toy industry: case study of a teddy bear incorporating electric and electronic components , 2009 .

[3]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Environmental decision support for the construction of a "green" mountain hut. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Belarmino Adenso-Díaz,et al.  An analysis of some environmental consequences of European electrical and electronic waste regulation , 2008 .

[5]  Julie M Schoenung,et al.  An integrated impact assessment and weighting methodology: evaluation of the environmental consequences of computer display technology substitution. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Jun Sadaki,et al.  The recycling of plastic wastes from discarded TV sets: comparing energy recovery with mechanical recycling in the context of life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[7]  A. Inaba,et al.  Life cycle assessment; an approach to environmentally friendly PCs , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. ISEE-1997.

[8]  Richard K. Helling,et al.  Use of life cycle assessment to characterize the environmental impacts of polyol production options , 2009 .

[9]  David Harrison,et al.  Ecological Footprint Analysis Applied to Mobile Phones , 2006 .

[10]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  A life-cycle assessment for eco-redesign of a consumer electronic product , 2011 .

[11]  Eric Williams,et al.  Energy intensity of computer manufacturing: hybrid assessment combining process and economic input-output methods. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[13]  D. Dornfeld,et al.  Life-cycle energy demand and global warming potential of computational logic. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Kun-Mo Lee,et al.  Development of an Environmental Assessment Method for Consumer Electronics by combining Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches (11 pp) , 2006 .

[15]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Life cycle assessment study of color computer monitor , 2001 .

[16]  Scott Duncan,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[17]  Li-Teh Lu,et al.  Balancing the life cycle impacts of notebook computers: Taiwan's experience , 2006 .

[18]  Jinhui Li,et al.  Life cycle assessment study of a Chinese desktop personal computer. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  T. Aoe,et al.  Case study for calculation of Factor X (Eco-Efficiency) - comparing CRT TV, PDP TV and LCD TV , 2003, 2003 EcoDesign 3rd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[20]  Wolfram Scharnhorst,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the telecommunication industry: A review , 2006 .

[21]  B. Adenso-Díaz,et al.  Eco-Efficiency of Electric and Electronic Appliances: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) , 2009 .

[22]  Xiao Qian Ma,et al.  The energy consumption and environmental impacts of a color TV set in China , 2009 .

[23]  Jonathan G. Overly,et al.  Environmental life-cycle impacts of CRT and LCD desktop computer displays , 2005 .