Impacts of Openness on the Success of Information System Development Research Projects

Information Systems Development (ISD) research projects are those in which the conduction of research is not possible without the development of a tangible ICT solution. ISD research projects face inherent tensions between the need for exploration (i.e. radical innovation) and exploitation (i.e. incremental innovation). This requires varying degrees of openness to balance the exploration of new opportunities and exploitation of existing capabilities. In this paper, we investigate the management of openness in ISD research projects and their impact on project success. Findings from three ISD research projects are outlined which offer contrasting approaches to the management of openness. Each management approach is then evaluated according to the perspectives of success in the balance scorecard for projects i.e. Financial, Customer, Internal Business, and Learning and Innovation. Finally, key learnings from the projects are presented, as well as concluding remarks on success in ISD research projects.

[1]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding open source software development , 2002 .

[2]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[3]  Frédéric Adam,et al.  An integrated patient journey mapping tool for embedding quality in healthcare service reform , 2016, J. Decis. Syst..

[4]  Wendy E. Stewart.  2000 International Student Paper Award Winner: Balanced Scorecard for Projects , 2001 .

[5]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[6]  W. Stewart,et al.  BALANCED SCORECARD FOR PROJECTS , 2001 .

[7]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Ambidexterity: The Impact of Environmental and Organizational Antecedents , 2005 .

[8]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[9]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[10]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[11]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Creating Shared Understanding in Heterogeneous Work Groups: Why It Matters and How to Achieve It , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[14]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[15]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[16]  Dirk Riehle,et al.  Open Collaboration within Corporations Using Software Forges , 2009, IEEE Software.

[17]  Neil Anderson,et al.  A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity , 2009, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.