Evaluating driver comprehension of the roadway environment to retain accountability of safety during driving automation

Abstract Driver comprehension is a substantial component of situation awareness that involves the ability of an individual to understand the significance of an object, traffic sign, or hazard while driving. An increase in crashes related to autonomous driving systems has raised a concern regarding the safety of other roadway users due to the diminishing accountability resulting from a general lack of understanding of the limitations or disregard of the safety protocols by users. To keep drivers vigilant when engaged in partial automated systems, a methodology to monitor real-time driver comprehension was proposed. A driving simulator study consisting of 90 participants, equally split between males and females, was executed to establish driver comprehension in six different variations of driving difficulty. Joint probability density functions were created by considering percent time spent gazing, answers to probe questions, and driving performance. Based on these density functions, five levels of comprehension were devised and assigned thresholds. Overall, as task difficulty increased, a non-linear deterioration in driving speed along with an increase in total gaze duration was observed before comprehension was attained. A two-step validation protocol was also proposed to ensure similar levels of comprehension to non-automated driving from the human driver, when engaged in early forms of automation. The proposed real-time driver comprehension monitoring constitutes a first step toward developing a methodology to reinstate the accountability of safety of other roadway users when engaged in driver-in-the-loop automation systems.

[1]  Klaus Henning,et al.  The "cognitive car": A roadmap for research issues in the automotive sector , 2006, Annu. Rev. Control..

[2]  H. Z. Muhammed,et al.  Bivariate Weibull Distribution: Properties and Different Methods of Estimation , 2020, Annals of Data Science.

[3]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Direct Measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and Use of SAGAT , 2000 .

[5]  Thomas D. Hardiman,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Sagat and Sart for Evaluations of Situation Awareness , 1998 .

[6]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension , 2014, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[7]  C. Wickens,et al.  Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation: Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs , 2008 .

[8]  William J. Horrey,et al.  Automated driving: Safety blind spots , 2018 .

[9]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[10]  Alexandra Kondyli,et al.  Analysis of the effects of adaptive cruise control on driver behavior and awareness using a driving simulator , 2018, Journal of Transportation Safety & Security.

[11]  Michael A. Vidulich,et al.  The Relationship between Mental Workload and Situation Awareness , 2000 .

[12]  Christina M. Rudin-Brown,et al.  BEHAVIOURAL ADAPTATION TO ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ACC): IMPLICATIONS FOR PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES , 2004 .

[13]  Jacob Chan,et al.  Designing Traffic Signs : A Case Study on Driver Reading Patterns and Behavior , 2016 .

[14]  E. Chrysikou,et al.  Safety analysis of work zone complexity with respect to driver characteristics - A simulator study employing performance and gaze measures. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Ying Wang,et al.  The Effect of Traffic on Situation Awareness and Mental Workload: Simulator-Based Study , 2007, HCI.

[16]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[17]  Neville Stanton,et al.  Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Effects of Cognitive Load on Driving Performance: The Cognitive Control Hypothesis , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[19]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone , 2005 .

[20]  Annika F.L. Larsson,et al.  Learning from experience: familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving , 2014 .

[21]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The effect of driver cognitive abilities and distractions on situation awareness and performance under hazard conditions , 2016 .