Assessment of functional outcome after nerve repair in a longitudinal cohort.

To investigate the temporal changes in the results of clinical tests of the functional outcome after nerve repair, we followed up 19 patients periodically over a four year period after repair of the median or ulnar nerve at the forearm. Between the first and last follow-up four of the instruments used--Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, manual muscle testing, Sollerman grip test, and Jamar dynamometer--indicated significant and moderate to large improvements. A moderate and significant improvement was also noted during the same period in patients' estimation of pain or discomfort. Results of the two-point discrimination test did not change significantly over time. Most changes occurred during the first postoperative year, and thereafter it was principally motor function that improved. We conclude that four of the six used tests showed useful temporal dynamics during the follow-up time. The lack of responsiveness in two-point discrimination test suggests that other or complementary test instruments should be used for assessment of tactile gnosis after nerve repair.

[1]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  E. Fess,et al.  The need for reliability and validity in hand assessment instruments. , 1986, The Journal of hand surgery.

[3]  E. Moberg,et al.  Two-point discrimination test. A valuable part of hand surgical rehabilitation, e.g. in tetraplegia. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[4]  J. Comtet,et al.  Two-Point Discrimination Tests versus Functional Sensory Recovery in both Median and Ulnar Nerve Complete Transections , 1993, Journal of hand surgery.

[5]  J. Mendell,et al.  Manual muscle testing , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[7]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. , 1984, The Journal of hand surgery.

[8]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[9]  A M Jette,et al.  The disablement process. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[10]  Lewis E. Kazis,et al.  Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status , 1989, Medical care.

[11]  Göran Lundborg,et al.  Nerve Injury and Repair , 1988 .

[12]  D J Felleman,et al.  Functional reorganization in somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 of adult monkeys after median nerve repair: possible relationships to sensory recovery in humans , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  Rupert G. Miller Simultaneous Statistical Inference , 1966 .

[14]  D L Riddle,et al.  Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[15]  E. Moberg The unsolved problem—How to test the functional value of hand sensibility , 1991 .

[16]  M. Vastamäki,et al.  An Analysis of the Results of Late Reconstruction of 132 Median Nerves , 1993, Journal of hand surgery.

[17]  D. Marsh The validation of measures of outcome following suture of divided peripheral nerves supplying the hand. , 1990, Journal of hand surgery.

[18]  C. Sollerman,et al.  Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[19]  B. Rosén,et al.  Tubular versus conventional repair of median and ulnar nerves in the human forearm: early results from a prospective, randomized, clinical study. , 1997, The Journal of hand surgery.

[20]  A L Dellon,et al.  Two-point discrimination tester. , 1985, The Journal of hand surgery.

[21]  B. Rosén Recovery of sensory and motor function after nerve repair. A rationale for evaluation. , 1996, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[22]  S. Mackinnon,et al.  Long-term follow-up evaluation of cold sensitivity following nerve injury. , 1996, The Journal of hand surgery.

[23]  C. Green,et al.  Cold Intolerance Following Peripheral Nerve Injury , 1997, Journal of hand surgery.

[24]  C. Trombly,et al.  Anticipating the future: assessment of occupational function. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[25]  R. Oostendorp,et al.  Manual muscle strength testing: intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities for the intrinsic muscles of the hand. , 1995, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[26]  C. Parry Rehabilitation of the hand , 1973 .

[27]  A. Lee Dellon,et al.  Evaluation of sensibility and re-education of sensation in the hand , 1981 .

[28]  D. Campbell,et al.  What is Cold Intolerance? , 1998, Journal of hand surgery.