Community innovation for sustainable energy

As in other countries, there is a growing public, policy and business interest in the UK in the roles and potential of community-led initiatives for sustainable energy consumption and production. Such initiatives include green lifestyle-based activities to reduce energy consumption (e.g. Transition Towns, and Carbon Reduction Action Groups), more traditional behaviour change initiatives such as neighbourhood insulation projects and energy-saving campaigns, as well as renewable energy generation projects such as community-owned windfarms and biofuel projects. Case studies of specific projects identify a variety of rationales amongst participants, whilst policy interest suggests a more instrumental concern for facilitating additional, larger-scale sustainable energy transitions. Amongst participant rationales are ideas that bottom-up, community-based projects deliver energy savings and behaviour changes that top-down policy instruments cannot achieve, due to the greater local knowledge and engagement they embody, the sense of common ownership and empowerment, and the social capital and trust that is generated among local actors. These resources provide organisational and values-based 'grassroots innovations' which experiment with new consumption practices based on alternative 'new economics' values. However, previous research shows 'grassroots innovations' face a series of critical challenges requiring support to overcome, in order to achieve their potential benefits more widely. This includes developing 'niche' networks for mobilising reforms both to highly centralised energy institutions and infrastructures, as well as deeply ingrained social practices of 'normal' energy consumption and everyday life. What makes this experience fascinating for the purposes of the SCORAI workshop is the way these community-based initiatives are trying to develop new energy-related consumption practices with a view to the socio-technical transition to local, renewable or lower carbon energy systems. Understandably, many projects remain practically focused on securing early successes and resourcing their long-term survival. However, the institutional and infrastructure reforms that will help in this endeavour require strategies for addressing the wider (national and international) political economy of consumption which adopts an ecological modernisation approach to sustainability. In surveying the community energy scene in the UK, our paper pays particular attention to this last issue.

[1]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[2]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[3]  J. Thøgersen How May Consumer Policy Empower Consumers for Sustainable Lifestyles? , 2005 .

[4]  A. Butler The New Economics of Sustainable Consumption: Seeds of Change , 2011 .

[5]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[6]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change , 2010 .

[7]  Steven M. Hoffman,et al.  From private lives to collective action: Recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program , 2010 .

[8]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[9]  Audley Genus,et al.  Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions , 2008 .

[10]  Geoff Mulgan,et al.  In and out of sync The challenge of growing social innovations , 2007 .

[11]  Willett Kempton,et al.  The Legacy of Twenty Years of Energy Demand Management: we know more about Individual Behaviour but next to Nothing about Demand , 2000 .

[12]  Jennifer Rogers,et al.  Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects , 2008 .

[13]  Dries. L. T. Hegger,et al.  Niche Management and its Contribution to Regime Change: The Case of Innovation in Sanitation , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[14]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The Alternative Technology Movement: An Analysis of its Framing and Negotiation of Technology Development , 2005 .

[15]  G. Walker,et al.  Carbon reduction, 'the public' and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. , 2007 .

[16]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Community renewable energy: What should it mean , 2008 .

[17]  Joshua Lockyer Intentional Community Carbon Reduction and Climate Change Action: From Ecovillages to Transition Towns , 2010 .

[18]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK , 2007, Global Environmental Politics.

[19]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use? , 2008 .

[20]  Ralph Horne,et al.  Transitioning to low carbon communities: from behaviour change to systemic change: lessons from Australia , 2010 .

[21]  Bradley D. Parrish,et al.  Building capacity for low-carbon communities: The role of grassroots initiatives , 2010 .

[22]  E. Shove Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .

[23]  P. Vergragt,et al.  Social experiments in the development of environmental technology: a bottom-up perspective , 1995 .

[24]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  The Contribution of Local Experiments and Negotiation Processes to Field-Level Learning in Emerging (Niche) Technologies , 2008 .

[25]  A. Lovins,et al.  Soft energy paths , 1978, Nature.

[26]  E. F. Schumacher,et al.  Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered , 1974 .

[27]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[28]  H. V. D. Heijden Environmental movements, ecological modernisation and political opportunity structures , 1999 .

[29]  J. Foweraker Theorizing Social Movements , 1995 .

[30]  Rob Raven,et al.  Transitions and strategic niche management: towards a competence kit for practitioners , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[31]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[32]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Non-linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003) , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[33]  Johan Schot,et al.  Strategies for shifting technological systems : the case of the automobile system , 1994 .

[34]  P. D. Dunn,et al.  Appropriate Technology: Technology with a Human Face , 1979 .

[35]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda , 2007 .

[36]  J. Halfmann :Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization , 2009 .

[37]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions , 2009 .

[38]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[39]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet , 2011 .

[40]  R. Raven Towards alternative trajectories? Reconfigurations in the Dutch electricity regime , 2006 .