Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population-based diabetes disease management program.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic plantar pressure assessment to determine patients at high risk for neuropathic ulceration. In choosing the cut point, we looked for an optimum combination of sensitivity and specificity of plantar pressure to screen for neuropathic ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 1,666 consecutive individuals with diabetes (50.3% male) presenting to a large urban managed care-based outpatient clinic were enrolled in this longitudinal 2-year outcome study. Patients received a standardized medical and musculoskeletal assessment at the time of enrollment, including evaluation in an onsite gait laboratory. RESULTS Of the entire population, 263 patients (15.8%) either presented with or developed an ulcer during the 24-month follow-up period. As expected, baseline peak plantar pressure was significantly higher in the ulcerated group than in the group who did not ulcerate (95.5 +/- 26.4 vs. 85.1 +/- 27.3 N/cm(2), P < 0.001). There was also a trend toward increased pressure with increasing numbers of foot deformities, as well as with increasing foot risk classification (P = 0.0001). Peak pressure was not a suitable diagnostic tool by itself to identify high-risk patients. After eliminating patients without loss of protective sensation, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimal cut point, as determined by a balance of sensitivity and specificity, was 87.5 N/cm(2), yielding a sensitivity of 63.5% and a specificity of 46.3%. CONCLUSIONS The data from this evaluation continue to support the notion that elevated foot pressure is an important risk factor for foot complications. However, the ROC analysis suggests that foot pressure is a poor tool by itself to predict foot ulcers.

[1]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Who is at risk for diabetic foot ulceration? , 1998, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery.

[2]  M. Cornwall,et al.  Comparison of three methods for obtaining plantar pressures in nonpathologic subjects. , 1994, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[3]  L. Franco,et al.  The ROC Curve in the Evaluation of Fasting Capillary Blood Glucose as a Screening Test for Diabetes and IGT , 1994, Diabetes Care.

[4]  C. I. Franks,et al.  Dynamic Foot Pressure and Other Studies as Diagnostic and Management Aids in Diabetic Neuropathy , 1983, Diabetes Care.

[5]  L. Lavery,et al.  Reducing Dynamic Foot Pressures in High-Risk Diabetic Subjects With Foot Ulcerations: A comparison of treatments , 1996, Diabetes Care.

[6]  A. Veves,et al.  Role of Neuropathy and High Foot Pressures in Diabetic Foot Ulceration , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[7]  Paul Newrick,et al.  International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Off-loading the diabetic foot wound: a randomized clinical trial. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[9]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Peak foot pressures influence the healing time of diabetic foot ulcers treated with total contact casts. , 1998, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  A. Boulton The Pathogenesis of Diabetic Foot Problems: an Overview , 1996, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[11]  P. Abraham,et al.  Laser Doppler flowmetry in the diagnosis of chronic compartment syndrome , 1998 .

[12]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Continuous activity monitoring in persons at high risk for diabetes-related lower-extremity amputation. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[13]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Choosing a practical screening instrument to identify patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  B. Kirkwood Essentials of medical statistics. , 1988 .

[15]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Plantar pressures are higher in diabetic patients following partial foot amputation. , 1998, Ostomy/wound management.

[16]  L. Lavery,et al.  Effectiveness of the diabetic foot risk classification system of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[17]  T G McPoil,et al.  A Comparison of the Dynamic Pedobarograph and EMED Systems for Measuring Dynamic Foot Pressures , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[18]  C I Franks,et al.  Abnormalities of Foot Pressure in Early Diabetic Neuropathy , 1987, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[19]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Practical criteria for screening patients at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  C. I. Franks,et al.  The natural history of foot pressure abnormalities in neuropathic diabetic subjects. , 1987, Diabetes research.

[21]  K A Athanasiou,et al.  Is there a critical level of plantar foot pressure to identify patients at risk for neuropathic foot ulceration? , 1998, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[22]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Screening techniques to identify people at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration: a prospective multicenter trial. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[23]  T. Hasegawa,et al.  Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis on Fasting Plasma Glucose, HbA1c, and Fructosamine on Diabetes Screening , 1991, Diabetes Care.

[24]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Elevated Peak Plantar Pressures in Patients Who Have Charcot Arthropathy* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Lengthening of the Achilles tendon in diabetic patients who are at high risk for ulceration of the foot. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.