Uses of Probabilistic Exposure Models in Ecological Risk Assessments of Contaminated Sites

Food web models have two uses in assessments of environmental contaminants. First, they are used to determine whether remediation is needed by estimating exposure of end-point species and subsequent effects. Second, they are used to establish cleanup goals by estimating concentrations of contaminants in ambient media that will not cause significant effects. This paper demonstrates how achievement of these goals can be enhanced by the use of stochastic food web models. The models simulate the dynamics of PCBs and mercury in the food webs of mink and great blue herons. All parameters of the models are treated as having knowledge uncertainty, due to imperfect knowledge of the actual parameter values for the site, chemicals, and species of interest. This uncertainty is an indicator of the potential value of additional measurements. In addition, those parameters that are responsible for variance among individual organisms are assigned stochastic uncertainty. This uncertainty indicates the range of body burdens that are expected when the end-point species are monitored. These two types of uncertainty are separately accounted for in Monte Carlo simulations of the models. Preliminary monitoring results indicate that the models give reasonably good estimates of heron egg and nestling body burdens and of variancemore » among individuals. 20 refs, 7 refs., 3 tabs.« less

[1]  F. O. Hoffman,et al.  Model of the PCB and mercury exposure of mink and great blue heron inhabiting the off-site environment downstream from the US Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation , 1992 .

[2]  Kenneth T Bogen,et al.  Uncertainty in Environmental Health Risk Assessment , 1990 .

[3]  R. Eisler Mercury Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review , 1987 .

[4]  P. Stokes,et al.  The effects of poly chlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury, singly and in combination on mink. II: Reproduction and kit development , 1987, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[5]  R. Eisler Polychlorinated Biphenyl Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review , 2015 .

[6]  W. F. Reehl,et al.  Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods: Environmental Behavior of Organic Compounds , 1982 .

[7]  R. Thomann Equilibrium Model of Fate of Microcontaminants in Diverse Aquatic Food Chains , 1981 .

[8]  G. Suter Uncertainty in Environmental Risk Assessment , 1990 .

[9]  J. Connolly,et al.  Model of PCB in the Lake Michigan lake trout food chain. , 1984, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  P. Stokes,et al.  The effects of poly chlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury, singly and in combination, on Mink. I: Uptake and toxic responses , 1987, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[11]  D. Reagan,et al.  Pathways analysis method for estimating water and sediment criteria at hazardous waste sites , 1991 .

[12]  G. Fries,et al.  Retention and excretion of polychlorinated biphenyl residues by laying hens. , 1977, Poultry science.