Tissue engineered microsphere-based matrices for bone repair: design and evaluation.

The need for synthetic alternatives to conventional bone grafts is due to the limitations of current grafting materials. Our approach has been to design polymer-based graft substitutes using microsphere technology. The gel microsphere matrix and the sintered microsphere matrix were designed using the random packing of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres to create a three-dimensional porous structure. The evaluation of these methods dealt with analysis of effects of matrix composition and processing. Matrices were evaluated structurally by scanning electron microscopy and porosimetry, and biomechanically by compression testing. The evaluation revealed the high modulus of the gel microsphere matrix and the versatility of the sintered microsphere matrix. The gel microsphere matrix incorporated hydroxyapatite particles and had a Young's modulus of 1651 MPa, but structural analysis through SEM revealed a pore system less optimal for bone in-growth. The sintered microsphere matrices were fabricated without hydroxyapatite particles by thermally fusing polymeric microspheres into a three-dimensional array, possessing interconnectivity and a modulus range of 241 (+/-82)-349 (+/-89) MPa. The sintered microsphere matrix demonstrated a connected pore system and mechanical properties in the mid-range of cancellous bone. Porosimetry data indicated that matrix pore diameter varied directly with microsphere diameter, while pore volume was independent of microsphere diameter in the range of diameters examined. The microsphere-based matrices show promise as polymeric substitutes for bone repair.

[1]  J. Vacanti,et al.  Tissue engineering : Frontiers in biotechnology , 1993 .

[2]  C T Laurencin,et al.  Three-dimensional degradable porous polymer-ceramic matrices for use in bone repair. , 1996, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[3]  J. Wozney,et al.  Bone Formation with Use of rhBMP-2 (Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2)* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Trabecular Bone Mineral and Calculated Structure of Human Bone Specimens Scanned by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography: Relation to Biomechanical Properties , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  Cato T. Laurencin,et al.  STUDIES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TISSUE ENGINEERED MATRIX FOR BONE REGENERATION , 1998 .

[6]  Zhou Zhifang,et al.  Preparation and Evaluation in Vitro and Vivo of Copoly (lactic/glycolic) acid Microspheres Containing Norethisterone , 1993 .

[7]  B. Masri,et al.  Biology of allografting. , 1998, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[8]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Fundamentals of biomechanics in tissue engineering of bone. , 2000, Tissue engineering.

[9]  R. Jalil,et al.  Biodegradable poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microcapsules: problems associated with preparative techniques and release properties. , 1990, Journal of microencapsulation.

[10]  J. Goulet,et al.  Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone Graft: Complications and Functional Assessment , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  H R Allcock,et al.  A highly porous 3-dimensional polyphosphazene polymer matrix for skeletal tissue regeneration. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  J H Brekke,et al.  Principles of tissue engineering applied to programmable osteogenesis. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  P. Ma,et al.  Biodegradable polymer scaffolds with well-defined interconnected spherical pore network. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[14]  Peltier Lf The use of plaster of Paris to fill defects in bone. , 1961 .

[15]  A. Mikos,et al.  Fabrication of pliable biodegradable polymer foams to engineer soft tissues. , 1996, Cell transplantation.

[16]  E. White,et al.  Tissue ingrowth of Replamineform implants. , 1975, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  C T Laurencin,et al.  Immunofluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy studies of osteoblast growth and phenotypic expression in three-dimensional degradable synthetic matrices. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  C. R. Ullrich,et al.  Mechanical properties of compacted morselized cancellous bone graft using one-dimensional consolidation testing. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  P. Ma,et al.  Porous poly(L-lactic acid)/apatite composites created by biomimetic process. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  R. A. Forster,et al.  Alternatives to Autogenous Bone Graft: Efficacy and Indications , 1995, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[21]  Robert Langer,et al.  Controlled Delivery Systems for Proteins Based on Poly(Lactic/Glycolic Acid) Microspheres , 1991, Pharmaceutical Research.

[22]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[23]  E. White,et al.  The restoration of the articular surfaces overlying Replamineform porous biomaterials. , 1977, Journal of biomedical materials research.