Intelligence, comprehension, and opinion change

[1]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. , 1976 .

[2]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Facilitative and Inhibiting Effects of Distraction on Attitude Change , 1974 .

[3]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. , 1974 .

[4]  W. Watts.  Intelligence and Susceptibility to Persuasion Under Conditions of Active and Passive Participation. , 1973 .

[5]  R. Heslin,et al.  Quality versus difficulty: Alternative nterpretations of the relationship between self‐esteem and persuasibility1 , 1971 .

[6]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Distraction Increases Yielding to Propaganda by Inhibiting Counterarguing. , 1970 .

[7]  S. Lehmann,et al.  Personality and compliance: a study of anxiety and self-esteem in opinion and behavior change. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  M. Zellner.  Self-esteem, reception, and influenceability. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  H. H. Johnson,et al.  Relationship between authoritarianism and attitude change as a function of source credibility and type of communication. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  S. Millman.  Anxiety, comprehension, and susceptibility to social influence. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  H. H. Johnson,et al.  Effects of source credibility on the relationship between authoritarianism and attitude change. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Self-esteem and susceptibility to social influence. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  W. Mcguire,et al.  The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.