Estimation of the Electrostatic Effects in the LISA-Pathfinder Critical Test Mass Dynamics via the Method of Moments

LISA-Pathfinder is an European Space Agency (ESA) space mission flown between 2015 and 2017 to demonstrate a technological maturity sufficient for building a gravitational waves telescope in space, such as the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). A pair of cubic test masses is hosted inside the LISA-Pathfinder spacecraft and shielded from any force other than the interplanetary gravitational field. The purity of the shielding gives the performance of the mission. There are a number of aspects that had to be confirmed in-flight. One of them is the transition phase from the launch configuration, when the test masses are locked, to the science free-falling configuration. Each test mass is initially released from the mechanical constraints via a dedicated mechanism and then captured by an electrostatic control system. In fact, each test mass is surrounded by a set of electrodes for actuation and sensing purposes. The performance criterion of the release is the final velocity of each test mass relative to the spacecraft, with an upper threshold set to 5 ${\mu \text{ m/s}}$. The LISA-Pathfinder first in-flight release velocities highlighted an unexpected dynamics with large linear and angular velocities. The electrostatic control was successful, but only relying on a manual procedure that cannot be considered as baseline for LISA. This article helps investigating the in-flight noncompliance by dealing with the modeling of the electrostatic environment around each test mass and its contribution to the release and capture dynamics. The electrostatic model is based on the Method of Moments, a boundary element numerical technique suitable for estimating forces and capacitances between conductors. We also provide a short overview of the method, which can be used for the analysis of other phenomena within LISA and for the design of future gravitational waves telescopes and space projects.

[1]  Christian J. Killow,et al.  In-flight testing of the injection of the LISA Pathfinder test mass into a geodesic , 2021 .

[2]  G. Mueller,et al.  Numerical modeling and experimental demonstration of pulsed charge control for the space inertial sensor used in LISA , 2020, 2005.00917.

[3]  Salvatore J. Vitale,et al.  Precision charge control for isolated free-falling test masses: LISA pathfinder results , 2018, Physical Review D.

[4]  Walter Fichter,et al.  In-orbit performance of the LISA Pathfinder drag-free and attitude control system , 2018 .

[5]  J. P. López-Zaragoza,et al.  Beyond the Required LISA Free-Fall Performance: New LISA Pathfinder Results down to 20  μHz. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[6]  Daniele Bortoluzzi,et al.  On-ground testing of the role of adhesion in the LISA-Pathfinder test mass injection phase , 2017 .

[7]  J. P. López-Zaragoza,et al.  Charge-Induced Force Noise on Free-Falling Test Masses: Results from LISA Pathfinder. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[8]  J. P. López-Zaragoza,et al.  Sub-Femto-g Free Fall for Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatories: LISA Pathfinder Results. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[9]  Daniele Bortoluzzi,et al.  Experimental-Analytical Qualification of a Piezoelectric Mechanism for a Critical Space Application , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[10]  J. Conklin Drift mode accelerometry for spaceborne gravity measurements , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[11]  K. Reichenberger,et al.  Alignment and Testing of the GPRM as Part of the LTP Caging Mechanism , 2013 .

[12]  Daniele Bortoluzzi,et al.  Indirect measurement of metallic adhesion force as a function of elongation under dynamic conditions , 2013 .

[13]  Daniele Bortoluzzi,et al.  Prediction of the LISA-Pathfinder release mechanism in-flight performance , 2013 .

[14]  B. Zahnd,et al.  LISA PATHFINDER CAGE AND VENT MECHANISM - DEVELOPMENT AND QUALIFICATION , 2013 .

[15]  S. Buchman,et al.  The effects of patch-potentials on the gravity probe B gyroscopes. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.

[16]  Daniele Bortoluzzi,et al.  Object injection in geodesic conditions: In-flight and on-ground testing issues , 2010 .

[17]  Barrie D. Dunn,et al.  Assessment of Cold Welding Between Separable Contact Surfaces Due to Impact and Fretting under Vacuum , 2009 .

[18]  Walter Fichter,et al.  Revised electrostatic model of the LISA Pathfinder inertial sensor , 2009 .

[19]  Walton C. Gibson,et al.  The Method of Moments in Electromagnetics , 2007 .

[20]  Daniele Bortoluzzi,et al.  The Influence of Adhesion and Sub-Newton Pull-Off Forces on the Release of Objects in Outer Space , 2006 .

[21]  W. J. Weber,et al.  Measuring random force noise for LISA aboard the LISA pathfinder mission , 2004 .

[22]  T. J. Prince,et al.  LISA: The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna , 2003 .

[23]  R. Fox,et al.  Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. , 1999 .

[24]  Thomas F. Eibert,et al.  On the calculation of potential integrals for linear source distributions on triangular domains , 1995 .

[25]  J. Lowell,et al.  Contact electrification of metals , 1975 .

[26]  David Tabor,et al.  Adhesion between clean surfaces at light loads , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[27]  D. A. Dunnett Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[28]  Benjamin Lange,et al.  The Drag-Free Satellite , 1964 .