Frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography (fdEIT): algorithm development and feasibility study

Frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography (fdEIT) has been proposed to deal with technical difficulties of a conventional static EIT imaging method caused by unknown boundary geometry, uncertainty in electrode positions and other systematic measurement artifacts. In fdEIT, we try to produce images showing changes of a complex conductivity distribution with respect to frequency. Simultaneously injecting currents with at least two frequencies, we find differences of measured boundary voltages between those frequencies. In most previous studies, real parts of frequency-difference voltage data were used to reconstruct conductivity changes and imaginary parts to reconstruct permittivity changes. This conventional approach neglects the interplay of conductivity and permittivity upon measured boundary voltage data. In this paper, we propose an improved fdEIT image reconstruction algorithm that properly handles the interaction. It uses weighted frequency differences of complex voltage data and a complex sensitivity matrix to reconstruct frequency-difference images of complex conductivity distributions. We found that there are two major sources of image contrast in fdEIT. The first is a contrast in complex conductivity values between an anomaly and background. The second is a frequency dependence of a complex conductivity distribution to be imaged. We note that even for the case where conductivity and permittivity do not change with frequency, the fdEIT algorithm may show a contrast in frequency-difference images of complex conductivity distributions. On the other hand, even if conductivity and permittivity values significantly change with frequency, there is an example where we cannot find any contrast. The performance of the proposed method is demonstrated by using computer simulations to validate its feasibility in future experimental studies.

[1]  D. Isaacson,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography of complex conductivity distributions with noncircular boundary , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[3]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  A robust image reconstruction algorithm and its parallel implementation in electrical impedance tomography , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  D. C. Barber,et al.  Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography , 1996, Nature.

[6]  D. Isaacson,et al.  Electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  David Isaacson,et al.  NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem , 1990, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[8]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  Validation of a multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (mfEIT) system KHU Mark1: impedance spectroscopy and time-difference imaging , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[9]  David Isaacson,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2002, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[11]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  Calibration methods for a multi-channel multi-frequency EIT system , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[12]  H Griffiths,et al.  A dual-frequency applied potential tomography technique: computer simulations. , 1987, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[13]  Ohin Kwon,et al.  A real time algorithm for the location search of discontinuous conductivities with one measurement , 2002 .

[14]  D. Isaacson Distinguishability of Conductivities by Electric Current Computed Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  John G. Webster,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1991 .

[16]  Jin Keun Seo,et al.  An accurate formula for the reconstruction of conductivity inhomogeneities , 2003, Adv. Appl. Math..

[17]  Richard C. Tozer,et al.  Conductivity and permittivity images from an induced current electrical impedance tomography system , 1994 .

[18]  D. Djajaputra Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications , 2005 .

[19]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  The Reconstruction Problem , 2017 .

[20]  David Isaacson,et al.  A Layer-stripping Reconstruction Algorithm For Impedance Imaging , 1991, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Volume 13: 1991.

[21]  H Griffiths,et al.  Systematic errors in multi-frequency EIT. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[22]  R H Bayford,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography spectroscopy (EITS) for human head imaging. , 2003, Physiological measurement.

[23]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  Multi-frequency EIT system with radially symmetric architecture: KHU Mark1 , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[24]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  Comparing Reconstruction Algorithms for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  David Isaacson,et al.  Reconstructions of chest phantoms by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.