A prospective, blinded study of a PF4-dependent assay for HIT diagnosis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening, pro-thrombotic, antibody-mediated disorder. To maximize the likelihood of recovery, early and accurate diagnosis is critical. Widely available HIT assays such as the Platelet Factor 4-Heparin ELISAs lack specificity, and the "gold standard" C14-labeled serotonin release assay (SRA) is of limited value for early patient management due to availability only through reference laboratories. Recent studies demonstrate that "pathogenic" HIT antibodies selectively activate PF4-treated platelets and that a technically simpler assay, the PF4-dependent P-selectin Expression Assay (PEA), may provide an option for rapid and conclusive results. Four hundred and nine consecutive adults suspected of HIT were classified as disease-positive, -negative or -indeterminate based upon predefined criteria that combined 4Ts scores and HIT ELISA results. Patients deemed "HIT-indeterminate" were considered disease-negative in the primary analysis and disease-positive in a sensitivity analysis. The ability of PEA and SRA to identify patients judged to have HIT was compared using receiver operating characteristic curve statistics. Using these predefined criteria, the diagnostic accuracy of PEA was high (Area under the curve [AUC] of 0.94; 0.87-1.0, 95% CI) and similar to that of SRA (0.91; 0.82-1.0, 95% CI). In sensitivity analysis, the AUCs of PEA and SRA were also similar at 0.88 (0.78-0.98, 95% CI) and 0.86 (0.77-0.96, 95% CI), respectively. The PEA, a technically simple non-radioactive assay that uses ~20-fold fewer platelets compared to the SRA had high accuracy for diagnosing HIT. Widespread use of the PEA may facilitate timely and more effective management of patients with suspected HIT.

[1]  J. Kelton,et al.  Serotonin‐release assay‐negative heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia , 2020, American journal of hematology.

[2]  E. Saad,et al.  Severe persistent heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a renal transplant patient. , 2019, Thrombosis research.

[3]  P. Gimotty,et al.  The risk of major bleeding in patients with suspected heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia , 2019, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[4]  Y. Gruel,et al.  Frequency and Clinical Impact of Platelet Factor 4-Specific Antibodies in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , 2019, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[5]  T. Warkentin Laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia , 2019, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[6]  R. Mustafa,et al.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. , 2018, Blood advances.

[7]  Eric G. Johnson,et al.  Serotonin release assay (SRA)-negative HIT, a newly recognized entity: Implications for diagnosis and management. , 2018, Thrombosis research.

[8]  P. Hari,et al.  Disease burden, complication rates, and health-care costs of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the USA: a population-based study. , 2018, The Lancet. Haematology.

[9]  L. Rice HITs and misses in 100 years of heparin. , 2017, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[10]  Y. Gruel,et al.  Beneficial effect of exogenous platelet factor 4 for detecting pathogenic heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia antibodies , 2017, British journal of haematology.

[11]  R. Aster,et al.  A Platelet Factor 4‐Dependent Platelet Activation Assay Facilitates Early Detection of Pathogenic Heparin‐Induced Thrombocytopenia Antibodies , 2017, Chest.

[12]  R. Aster,et al.  IVIg for Treatment of Severe Refractory Heparin‐Induced Thrombocytopenia , 2017, Chest.

[13]  G. Arepally Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. , 2017, Blood.

[14]  R. Aster,et al.  A Novel PF4-Dependent Platelet Activation Assay Identifies Patients Likely to Have Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia/Thrombosis. , 2016, Chest.

[15]  S. Schulman,et al.  Definition of clinically relevant non‐major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non‐surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH , 2015, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[16]  A. Greinacher CLINICAL PRACTICE. Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  W. Wood,et al.  Five hematologic tests and treatments to question. , 2014, Blood.

[18]  R. Gerkin,et al.  Improving clinical interpretation of the anti-platelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia through the use of receiver operating characteristic analysis, stratum-specific likelihood ratios, and Bayes theorem. , 2013, Chest.

[19]  Adam Cuker,et al.  Predictive value of the 4Ts scoring system for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Blood.

[20]  D. Cines,et al.  How I treat heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. , 2012, Blood.

[21]  Xavier Robin,et al.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[22]  Y. Gruel,et al.  Effectiveness of a new immuno-assay for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and improved specificity when detecting IgG antibodies , 2009, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[23]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[24]  C. Sigouin,et al.  Evaluation of pretest clinical score (4 T's) for the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia in two clinical settings , 2006, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[25]  J. Kelton,et al.  Determinants of donor platelet variability when testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. , 1992, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[26]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[27]  R. Aster,et al.  Heparin-independent, PF4-dependent binding of HIT antibodies to platelets: implications for HIT pathogenesis. , 2015, Blood.