Reviewing dermatology manuscripts and publications.

Although quality scientific publications depend on peer review, physicians rarely receive formal training on how to review a manuscript. Comprehensive guidelines direct how meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RTCs), and observational trials should be reported in the literature. This article provides instruction on how to effectively review a life sciences manuscript, particularly those in dermatology.

[1]  M Docherty,et al.  The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers , 1999, BMJ.

[2]  N. Scheinfeld.  Photographic images, digital imaging, dermatology, and the law , 2004 .

[3]  F. Hoppin.  How I review an original scientific article. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  S. Goodman,et al.  Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Robert P. Dellavalle,et al.  Journals should set a new standard in transparency , 2007, Nature.

[6]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. , 2006, JAMA.

[7]  M. Isohanni.  Peer review – still the well‐functioning quality control and enhancer in scientific research , 2005, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[8]  Scott R. Freeman,et al.  Human research review committee requirements in medical journals. , 2008, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[9]  R. Dellavalle.  Cultivating peer review. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[10]  Alan W. Pearson.  Journal review , 1973 .

[11]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  John Spencer,et al.  Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal , 2005, Medical education.

[14]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[15]  Dale J Benos,et al.  How to review a paper. , 2003, Advances in physiology education.

[16]  R. Dellavalle,et al.  Going, Going, Gone: Lost Internet References , 2003, Science.

[17]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.