Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms

Scale is an important issue in the automated detection of masses in mammograms, due to the range of possible sizes masses can have. In this work, it was examined if detection of masses can be done at a single scale, or whether it is more appropriate to use the output of the detection method at different scales in a multiscale scheme. Three different pixel-based mass-detection methods were used for this purpose. The first method is based on convolution of a mammogram with the Laplacian of a Gaussian, the second method is based on correlation with a model of a mass, and the third is a new approach, based on statistical analysis of gradient-orientation maps. Experiments with simulated masses indicated that little can be gained by applying the methods at a number of scales. These results were confirmed by experiments on a set of 71 cases (132 mammograms) containing a malignant tumor. The performance of each method in a multiscale scheme was similar to the performance at the optimal single scale. A slight improvement was found for the correlation method when the output of different scales was combined. This was especially evident at low specificity levels. The correlation method and the gradient-orientation-analysis method have similar performances. A sensitivity of approximately 75% is reached at a level of one false positive per image. The method based on convolution with the Laplacian of the Gaussian performed considerably worse, in both a single and multiscale scheme.

[1]  K Doi,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[2]  L Tarassenko,et al.  THE DETECTION OF ABNORMALITIES IN MAMMOGRAMS , 1994 .

[3]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[5]  L P Clarke,et al.  Digital mammography: computer-assisted diagnosis method for mass detection with multiorientation and multiresolution wavelet transforms. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[6]  C J Baines,et al.  The role of the reference radiologist. Estimates of inter-observer agreement and potential delay in cancer detection in the national breast screening study. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[7]  King-Sun Fu,et al.  Handbook of pattern recognition and image processing , 1986 .

[8]  Ian W. Ricketts,et al.  The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database , 1994 .

[9]  D. Brzakovic,et al.  MAMMOGRAM SCREENING USING MULTIRESOLUTION-BASED IMAGE SEGMENTATION , 1993 .

[10]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Combining Single View Features and Asymmetry for Detection of Mass Lesions , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[11]  Y H Chang,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[12]  Roland Holland,et al.  The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen‐detected cancers , 1993, Cancer.

[13]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[14]  W F Bischof,et al.  Automated detection and classification of breast tumors. , 1992, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[15]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[16]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  The detection of abnormal masses in mammograms , 1997 .

[17]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. , 1998, Radiology.

[18]  L. Fajardo,et al.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Ping Lu,et al.  Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of masses and clustered microcalcifications from digital mammograms , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[20]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Automation in mammography: computer vision and human perception , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[21]  S. Lai,et al.  On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.