New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption

In contrast to logical criteria of rationality, which can be assessed entirely by reference to the system of preferences, substantive criteria of rational choice refer to an independent evaluation of the outcomes of decisions. One of these substantive criteria is the experienced hedonic utility of outcomes. Research indicates that people are myopic in their decisions, may lack skill in predicting their future tastes, and can be led to erroneous choices by fallible memory and incorrect evaluation of past experiences. Theoretical and practical implications of these challenges to the assumption of economic rationality are discussed.

[1]  V. Smith,et al.  Experimental tests of the endowment effect , 1996 .

[2]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures , 1996, Pain.

[3]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes , 1995 .

[4]  Shlomo Zilberstein,et al.  Models of Bounded Rationality , 1995 .

[5]  Bruce G. S. Hardie,et al.  Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice , 1993 .

[6]  D. Kahneman,et al.  When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End , 1993 .

[7]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Amartya Sen,et al.  INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF CHOICE , 1993 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[10]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Experiences extended across time: Evaluation of moments and episodes , 1992 .

[11]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Predicting a changing taste: Do people know what they will like? , 1992 .

[12]  J. Elster,et al.  Utility from memory and anticipation. , 1992 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[14]  Herbert J. Hovenkamp,et al.  Legal Policy and the Endowment Effect , 1991, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[15]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[16]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Do Workers Prefer Increasing Wage Profiles? , 1991, Journal of Labor Economics.

[17]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being: Notes on the psychology of utility , 1991 .

[18]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  I. Simonson.  The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 1990 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Causes of Preference Reversal , 1990 .

[21]  R. Hogarth.  Insights in Decision Making , 1990 .

[22]  Robert C. Ellickson.  Bringing Culture and Human Frailty to Rational Actors: A Critique of Classical Law and Economics , 1989 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[24]  A. Baier,et al.  Reasons and Persons , 1984 .

[25]  J. Christensen-Szalanski.  Discount Functions and the Measurement of Patients' Values , 1984, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[26]  K. Arrow.  Risk Perception in Psychology and Economics , 1982 .

[27]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[28]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[31]  P. Brickman,et al.  Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  J. March.  Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[33]  William G. Zikmund,et al.  The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction , 1976 .

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Who accepts Savage's axiom? , 1974 .

[35]  I. Fisher,et al.  Is "Utility" the Most Suitable Term for the Concept It is Used to Denote? , 1918 .