Effects of manufacturing constraints on the cost and weight efficiency of integral and differential automotive composite structures

The introduction of carbon fibre composites into the high volume automotive sector challenges the design process, since these components not only need to be light but also producible in a cost-efficient manner. One way forward is to introduce manufacturing constraints into the design process, but such constraints affect the freedom of design and opportunities to tailor material properties. This work examines the trade-offs between cost-effective design for manufacturing and the weight optimization of composite structures. This will be achieved by introducing restrictions to the number of plies allowed in structural optimization in order to simplify pre-operations and reduce overall manufacturing investments. Both integral and differential design solutions are considered. It was observed that differential solutions were always more cost and weight efficient than the integral solution, however too severe manufacturing constraints result in an expensive final part due to the additional weight.

[1]  Malin Åkermo,et al.  Cost and weight efficient partitioning of composite automotive structures , 2017 .

[2]  L. Hart-Smith Adhesive-bonded double-lap joints. [analytical solutions for static load carrying capacity] , 1973 .

[3]  Malin Åkermo,et al.  Method for cost and weight-efficient material diversity and partitioning of a carbon fibre composite body structure , 2015 .

[4]  Erik Lund,et al.  Topology and thickness optimization of laminated composites including manufacturing constraints , 2013 .

[5]  Catharine Marsden,et al.  Design for Manufacturing - One-Piece, Fibre-Placed Composite Helicopter Tailboom , 2011, MSE 2011.

[6]  Kevin Jiang Introduction , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[7]  Sujit Das,et al.  THE COST OF AUTOMOTIVE POLYMER COMPOSITES: A REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF DOE'S LIGHTWEIGHT MATERIALS COMPOSITES RESEARCH , 2001 .

[8]  Malin Åkermo,et al.  Integral versus differential design for high-volume manufacturing of composite structures , 2015 .

[9]  L. J. Hart-Smith The key to designing durable adhesively bonded joints , 1994 .

[10]  Bo P. Wang,et al.  Optimum design of a composite structure with three types of manufacturing constraints , 1991 .

[11]  Alain Vautrin,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Design and Manufacture of Composite Structures , 2001 .

[12]  D. Bond,et al.  Principles and practices of adhesive bonded structural joints and repairs , 1999 .

[13]  Don Kelly,et al.  Multi-objective optimisation of composite aerospace structures , 2002 .

[14]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Manufacturing Costs for Advanced Composites Aerospace Parts , 1991 .

[15]  B. P. Wang,et al.  Optimum design of a composite structure with manufacturing constraints , 1993 .

[16]  Birna P. Kristinsdottir,et al.  Including manufacturing tolerances in composite design , 1994 .

[17]  F. Field,et al.  Strategic Materials Selection In The Automobile Body: Economic Opportunities for Polymer Composite Design , 2008 .

[18]  A. Erumban,et al.  Productivity and Unit Labor Cost in Indian Manufacturing : A Comparative Perspective , 2007 .

[19]  Malin Åkermo,et al.  Method for the cost-efficient and weight-efficient material diversity and partitioning of a carbon fibre composite body structure , 2016 .