A Validation Framework for Head-Motion Artifacts in Dental Cone-Beam CT

Patient motion during CT data acquisition degrades image quality. Therefore, the development of motion detection and motion correction methods are in the focus of many research groups. In general the strength of motion artefacts depends on the motion parameters and on the structures of the anatomical area of interest. Unfortunately, a realistic ground truth data and the corresponding artefact prone reconstructions with known motion parameters during data acquisition are often not available or tedious to obtain. In this work, a framework is presented to generate a database for motion quantification in dental cone-beam CT. Practical aspects and challenges will be described. Furthermore, the generated database will be utilized to investigate the influence of head motion on the reconstruction image quality. Different assessment criteria will be proposed for the motion distorted data. This work provides a basis for data-driven motion detection and correction methods and serves as a first step to understand the effects of motion.

[1]  Roger Y. Tsai,et al.  Techniques for calibration of the scale factor and image center for high accuracy 3D machine vision metrology , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  R K Ten Haken,et al.  Three-dimensional motion analysis of an improved head immobilization system for simulation, CT, MRI, and PET imaging. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[4]  M. Cohnen,et al.  Radiation dose in dental radiology , 2002, European Radiology.

[5]  F. Beckmann,et al.  Automated determination of the center of rotation in tomography data. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  Quantification and Clinical Relevance of Head Motion During Computed Tomography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[7]  Matteo Bettuzzi,et al.  Relevance of head motion in dental cone-beam CT scanner images depending on patient positioning , 2008, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[8]  Roger Fulton,et al.  The design and implementation of a motion correction scheme for neurological PET. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Andre Z Kyme,et al.  Data-driven motion correction in single photon emission computed tomography of the brain , 2004 .

[10]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing.@@@Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. , 1994 .

[11]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Du-Yih Tsai,et al.  Information Entropy Measure for Evaluation of Image Quality , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[13]  S J Riederer,et al.  Image metric‐based correction (Autocorrection) of motion effects: Analysis of image metrics , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  J. Price,et al.  Comparison of phase-contrast and fluorescence digital autofocus for scanning microscopy. , 1994, Cytometry.