Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger

Abstract With the exponential growth in the mobile device market over the last decade, chatbots are becoming an increasingly popular option to interact with users, and their popularity and adoption are rapidly spreading. These mobile devices change the way we communicate and allow ever-present learning in various environments. This study examined educational chatbots for Facebook Messenger to support learning. The independent web directory was screened to assess chatbots for this study resulting in the identification of 89 unique chatbots. Each chatbot was classified by language, subject matter and developer's platform. Finally, we evaluated 47 educational chatbots using the Facebook Messenger platform based on the analytic hierarchy process against the quality attributes of teaching, humanity, affect, and accessibility. We found that educational chatbots on the Facebook Messenger platform vary from the basic level of sending personalized messages to recommending learning content. Results show that chatbots which are part of the instant messaging application are still in its early stages to become artificial intelligence teaching assistants. The findings provide tips for teachers to integrate chatbots into classroom practice and advice what types of chatbots they can try out.

[1]  Simon So,et al.  Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[2]  Michael M. Grant,et al.  Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  Robert Chartrand,et al.  Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Mobile Devices in a University Language Classroom , 2016 .

[4]  Chris Speed,et al.  The Ethnobot: Gathering Ethnographies in the Age of IoT , 2018, CHI.

[5]  Isaiah T. Awidi,et al.  Facebook group in the learning design of a higher education course: An analysis of factors influencing positive learning experience for students , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. 2nd Edition , 1993 .

[7]  T. Saaty.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[8]  SungYao-Ting,et al.  The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance , 2016 .

[9]  I. Yildirim.  The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students' attitudes toward lessons , 2017, Internet High. Educ..

[10]  David Coniam.  The linguistic accuracy of chatbots: usability from an ESL perspective , 2014 .

[11]  T. Saaty.  Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process , 2008 .

[12]  R. Crutzen,et al.  An artificially intelligent chat agent that answers adolescents' questions related to sex, drugs, and alcohol: an exploratory study. , 2011, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[13]  D. Westerman,et al.  Learned risks and experienced rewards: Exploring the potential sources of students' attitudes toward social media and face-to-face communication , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Weisheng Li,et al.  Automatic Chatbot Knowledge Acquisition from Online Forum via Rough Set and Ensemble Learning , 2008, 2008 IFIP International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing.

[15]  Oscar Díaz,et al.  A quality analysis of facebook messenger's most popular chatbots , 2018, SAC.

[16]  Florian Brühlmann,et al.  Facilitating professional mobile learning communities with instant messaging , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[17]  M. Roblyer,et al.  Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  Eric Atwell,et al.  ALICE Chatbot: Trials and Outputs , 2015, Computación y Sistemas.

[19]  Joseph Weizenbaum,et al.  and Machine , 1977 .

[20]  Frederick B. King,et al.  A virtual student: Not an ordinary Joe , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  Jason Hutchens,et al.  How to Pass the Turing Test by Cheating , 1997 .

[22]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Annika Silvervarg,et al.  Building a Social Conversational Pedagogical Agent: Design Challenges and Methodological approaches , 2010 .

[24]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[25]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Jill Watson Doesn't Care if You're Pregnant: Grounding AI Ethics in Empirical Studies , 2018, AIES.

[26]  Bob Heller,et al.  Freudbot: An Investigation of Chatbot Technology in Distance Education , 2005 .