Precipitation and Damaging Floods: Trends in the United States, 1932-97

The poor relationship between what climatologists, hydrologists, and other physical scientists call floods, and those floods that actually cause damage to life or property, has limited what can be reliably said about the causes of observed trends in damaging floods. It further limits what can be said about future impacts of floods on society based on predicted changes in the global hydrological cycle. This paper presents a conceptual framework for the systematic assessment of the factors that condition observed trends in flood damage. Using the framework, it assesses the role that variability in precipitation has in damaging flooding in the United States at national and regional levels. Three different measures of flood damage—absolute, per capita, and per unit wealth—each lead to different conclusions about the nature of the flood problem. At a national level, of the 10 precipitation measures examined in this study, the ones most closely related to flood damage are the number of 2-day heavy rainfall events and the number of wet days. Heavy rainfall events are defined relative to a measure of average rainfall in each area, not as absolute thresholds. The study indicates that the growth in recent decades in total damage is related to both climate factors and societal factors: increased damage is associated with increased precipitation and with increasing population and wealth. At the regional level, this study reports a stronger relationship between precipitation measures and flood damage, and indicates that different measures of precipitation are most closely related to damage in different regions. This study suggests that climate plays an important, but by no means determining, role in the growth in damaging floods in the United States in recent decades.

[1]  Red Crescent Societies World disasters report , 1993 .

[2]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Temporal Fluctuations in Weather and Climate Extremes That Cause Economic and Human Health Impacts: A Review , 1999 .

[3]  R. Pielke,et al.  Nine Fallacies of Floods , 1999 .

[4]  R. Ward,et al.  Principles of Hydrology , 1968 .

[5]  Assessment of the economic effects of flooding , 1994 .

[6]  Harry F. Lins,et al.  Streamflow trends in the United States , 1999 .

[7]  David A. Smith Greenhouse climatic change and flood damages, the implications , 1993 .

[8]  J. Bruce,et al.  Climate change, 1995 : economic and social dimensions of climate change , 1997 .

[9]  L. Associates Floodplain management in the United States : an assessment report , 1992 .

[10]  Stanley A. Changnon,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Heavy-Precipitation Events in the Midwest , 1993 .

[11]  P. Walker,et al.  World disasters report 1995. , 1995 .

[12]  Victor R. Baker,et al.  HYDROLOGICAL UNDERSTANDING AND SOCIETAL ACTION 1 , 1998 .

[13]  D. Easterling,et al.  Indices of Climate Change for the United States , 1996 .

[14]  Thomas R. Karl,et al.  Secular Trends of Precipitation Amount, Frequency, and Intensity in the United States , 1998 .

[15]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Atmospheric Moisture Residence Times and Cycling: Implications for Rainfall Rates and Climate Change , 1998 .

[16]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Conceptual Framework for Changes of Extremes of the Hydrological Cycle with Climate Change , 1999 .

[17]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[18]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[19]  Stanley A. Changnon,et al.  The Great Flood Of 1993: Causes, Impacts, And Responses , 1996 .

[20]  John D. Wiener Research opportunities in search of federal flood policy , 1996 .

[21]  S. Changnon,et al.  Detection of changes in streamflow and floods resulting from climate fluctuations and land use-drainage changes , 1996 .

[22]  R. Pielke,et al.  Normalized Hurricane Damages in the United States: 1925-95 , 1998 .

[23]  Jerry L. Rasmussen,et al.  Floodplain management into the 21st century: a blueprint for change ― sharing the challenge , 1994 .