Direct transcription of low-thrust trajectories with finite trajectory elements

This paper presents a novel approach to the design of Low-Thrust trajectories, based on a first order approximated analytical solution of Gauss planetary equations. This analytical solution is shown to have a better accuracy than a second-order explicit numerical integrator and at a lower computational cost. Hence, it can be employed for the fast propagation of perturbed Keplerian motion when moderate accuracy is required. The analytical solution was integrated in a direct transcription method based on a decomposition of the trajectory into direct finite perturbative elements (DFPET). DFPET were applied to the solution of two-point boundary transfer problems. Furthermore the paper presents an example of the use of DFPET for the solution of a multiobjective trajectory optimisation problem in which both the total ∆V and transfer time are minimized with respect to departure and arrival dates. Two transfer problems were used as test cases: a direct transfer from Earth to Mars and a spiral from a low Earth orbit to the International Space Station.

[1]  Dario Izzo,et al.  Constrained global optimization of low-thrust interplanetary trajectories , 2010, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[3]  Bradley J. Wall,et al.  Shape-Based Approach to Low-Thrust Rendezvous Trajectory Design , 2009 .

[4]  Lorenzo Casalino,et al.  Optimal Low-Thrust Escape Trajectories Using Gravity Assist , 1999 .

[5]  John T. Betts,et al.  Optimal Low Thrust Trajectories to the Moon , 2003, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[6]  R. Battin.  An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics , 1987 .

[7]  G. Lantoine,et al.  The Stark Model: An Exact, Closed-Form Approach to Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization , 2011 .

[8]  B. Conway,et al.  Optimization of low-thrust interplanetary trajectories using collocation and nonlinear programming , 1995 .

[9]  Matthew A. Vavrina,et al.  Global Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization through Hybridization of a Genetic Algorithm and a Direct Method , 2008 .

[10]  J. Betts.  Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization , 1998 .

[11]  A. A. Sukhanov,et al.  Optimization of transfers under constraints on the thrust direction: II , 2007 .

[12]  J. Cole,et al.  Multiple Scale and Singular Perturbation Methods , 1996 .

[13]  Daniel Novak,et al.  Improved Shaping Approach to the Preliminary Design of Low-Thrust Trajectories , 2011 .

[14]  Jean Albert Kechichian,et al.  Reformulation of Edelbaum' s Low-Thrust Transfer Problem Using Optimal Control Theory , 1997 .

[15]  Cesar A. Ocampo,et al.  Optimization of Roundtrip, Time-Constrained, Finite Burn Trajectories via an Indirect Method , 2005 .

[16]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  A hybrid multiobjective optimization algorithm applied to space trajectory optimization , 2010, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[17]  G. Hahn.  A modified Euler method for dynamic analyses , 1991 .

[18]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  On the optimality of a shape-based approach based on pseudo-equinoctial elements , 2006 .

[19]  Anastassios E. Petropoulos,et al.  Automated Design of Low-Thrust Gravity-Assist Trajectories , 2000 .

[20]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  Semi-Analytical Solution for the Optimal Low-Thrust Deflection of Near-Earth Objects , 2009 .

[21]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  Optimizing low-thrust and gravity assist maneuvers to design interplanetary trajectories , 2011, ArXiv.