Noninvasive assessment of LV contraction patterns using CMR to identify responders to CRT.

OBJECTIVES Type II activation describes the U-shaped electrical activation of the left ventricle (LV) with a line of block in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). We sought to determine if a corresponding pattern of contraction could be identified using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine imaging and whether this predicted response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND U-shaped LV electrical activation in LBBB has been shown to predict favorable response to CRT. It is not known if the degree of electromechanical coupling is such that the same is true for LV contraction patterns. METHODS A total of 52 patients (48% ischemic) scheduled for CRT implantation prospectively underwent pre-implantation CMR cine analysis using endocardial contour tracking software to generate time-volume curves and contraction propagation maps. These were analyzed to assess the contraction sequence of the LV. The effect of contraction pattern on CRT response in terms of reverse remodeling (RR) and clinical parameters (New York Heart Association functional class, 6-min walk distance and Heart Failure Questionnaire score) was assessed at 6 months. RESULTS Two types of contraction pattern were identified; homogenous spread from septum to lateral wall (type I, n = 27) and presence of block with a subsequent U-shaped contraction pattern (type II, n = 25). Rates of RR in those with a type 2 pattern were significantly greater at 6 months (80% vs. 26%, p < 0.001) as was mean increase in 6-min walk distance (126 ± 106 m vs. 55 ± 60 m; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Cine CMR can identify a U-shaped pattern of contraction which predicts increased echocardiographic and clinical response rates to CRT in patients with LBBB.

[1]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Long-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy is related to the extent of left ventricular reverse remodeling at midterm follow-up. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[3]  J. Daubert,et al.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[5]  Y. Rudy,et al.  Electrophysiologic substrate and intraventricular left ventricular dyssynchrony in nonischemic heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[6]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Usefulness of QRS duration to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Mapping propagation of mechanical activation in the paced heart with MRI tagging. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[8]  H. Wellens,et al.  Variable Patterns of Septal Activation in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block and Heart Failure , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  Cheuk-Man Yu,et al.  Effect of left ventricular endocardial activation pattern on echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2007, Heart.

[10]  Leon Axel,et al.  Advances in MRI tagging techniques for determining regional myocardial strain , 2006, Current cardiology reports.

[11]  Reza Razavi,et al.  Relationship between endocardial activation sequences defined by high-density mapping to early septal contraction (septal flash) in patients with left bundle branch block undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  Malte Kelm,et al.  Feasibility and initial experience of assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and semi-automatic border detection , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[13]  D. DeMets,et al.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[15]  C A Bucknall,et al.  Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping in cardiac resynchronisation therapy , 2003, Heart.

[16]  Angelo Auricchio,et al.  Characterization of Left Ventricular Activation in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle-Branch Block , 2004, Circulation.

[17]  J J Rice,et al.  Distribution of electromechanical delay in the heart: insights from a three-dimensional electromechanical model. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[18]  D. Delurgio,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Per Andreas Norseng,et al.  Mechanism of prolonged electromechanical delay in late activated myocardium during left bundle branch block. , 2011, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[20]  E. Konofagou,et al.  Imaging the electromechanical activity of the heart in vivo , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J W Covell,et al.  Effects of ventricular pacing on regional left ventricular performance in the dog. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  Thor Edvardsen,et al.  Evaluation of Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony by Onset of Active Myocardial Force Generation: A Novel Method That Differentiates Between Electrical and Mechanical Etiologies , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.