A new method for the computer-aided evaluation of three-dimensional changes in gypsum materials.

OBJECTIVES The quantitative evaluation of the time- or process-dependent three-dimensional stability of dental materials is a common question in dentistry. An investigation procedure has been developed based on a CAD-surface model of a prepared upper canine, as well as a high-precision physical copy (metal master die). The specific aim of this study was to test this method's reliability. Additionally, the ability of the developed procedure to determine the three-dimensional stability of resin-reinforced gypsum master casts over time was investigated. METHODS Ten duplicate dies of improved dental stone (esthetic-rock, dentona, Germany) were manufactured, and digitized 1, 3, 7, 28 and 56 days after pouring. A three-coordinate optical measuring device was used for the data acquisition. The three-dimensional accuracy of stone dies was determined by comparing the digitized data of the stone dies made from the metal master die to its CAD-surface model (Surfacer) Version 9.0. Imageware Inc., Ann Arbor Michigan, USA). To assess the procedure, test surfaces were created from the digitized data and compared with a reference. RESULTS The mean deviation between the digitized point cloud and the test surface was less than 3 microm. During the 56 day examination period no significant three-dimensional changes in dimensional stability were found. SIGNIFICANCE The procedure for the quantitative three-dimensional evaluation was shown to be suitable. Best-fit registration enabled a reliable alignment of the point cloud to the CAD-surface model. Alteration of three-dimensional accuracy over 6 weeks was insignificant and without clinical relevance.

[1]  R B Price,et al.  The dimensional accuracy of 12 impression material and die stone combinations. , 1991, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[2]  R. G. Chadwick,et al.  Development of a novel system for assessing tooth and restoration wear. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  E R Hewlett,et al.  Accuracy testing of three-dimensional digitizing systems. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  Gunther Notni,et al.  Optical 3D-coordinate measuring system using structured light , 1996, Other Conferences.

[5]  S. Ando,et al.  Application of a newly developed 3-D deformation measurement system to prosthetic dentistry. , 1996, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[6]  J H Bailey,et al.  Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part II: Complete arch form. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  N. Chaffee,et al.  Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part I: Single die. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  C. P. Fernandes,et al.  Accuracy, detail reproduction, and hardness of gypsum casts produced from silicone impressions treated with glow discharge. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  F. Teraoka,et al.  Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  S P Haug,et al.  Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resin-containing, and epoxy die materials. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  R Hickel,et al.  A New Optical 3-D Device for the Detection of Wear , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[12]  G Derrien,et al.  Comparison of transverse strength and dimensional variations between die stone, die epoxy resin, and die polyurethane resin. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  J A Stackhouse,et al.  The accuracy of stone dies made from rubber impression materials. , 1970, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  B R Lang,et al.  Determination of the accuracy of three die systems. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.