Fatigue limit state design of fast boats

Abstract Typically, the dominant load for the structural design of a planing hull is slamming, while sailing fast at head seas. The slamming is a violent fluid structure interaction, where dynamics, hydro-elasticity, and nonlinear structural effects may be important. Considering these effects in a rational design may reduce the scantlings as compare to design by rules, which assess the scantlings by applying a quasi-static design pressure and linear beam theory. More substantial reduction of the scantlings is expected in a limit state design, where extreme loading conditions and flexible structure increase the importance of hydro-elasticity and non-linearity. While applied rules specify allowable stresses that typically provide a service life of 20 years, without the need to check for fatigue; rational limit state design must incorporate the Fatigue Limit State (FLS). This paper presents a rational limit state design method for planing hulls, which apply hydro-elastic nonlinear dynamic structural analysis, to assess the fatigue service life, based on an operation plan specified by the client. The method integrates design rules with direct analysis of fluid-structure interaction and principles of representation of random sea, to a practical design procedure. Furthermore, a parametric analysis is applied to provide a database of 450 cases that may be used by designers for the assessment of fatigue service life in a practical range of geometrical parameters and service conditions. A design example demonstrates the potential of the method to reduce the scantlings.

[1]  Rui F. Martins,et al.  Static and Fatigue Behaviour of the Main Section of a Fast Patrol Boat , 2014 .

[2]  Odd M. Faltinsen,et al.  Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles , 2006 .

[3]  Naiquan Ye Fatigue Assessment of Aluminium Welded Box-stiffener Joints in Ships , 2008 .

[4]  John C. Davis,et al.  Contouring: A Guide to the Analysis and Display of Spatial Data , 1992 .

[5]  D. Yue,et al.  On the water impact of general two-dimensional sections , 1999 .

[6]  Armin W. Troesch,et al.  Hydroelastic impact of a wedge-shaped body , 2011 .

[7]  Odd M. Faltinsen,et al.  Hydroelastic Modeling of Wet Deck Slamming on Multihull Vessels , 2021 .

[8]  G. Oger,et al.  Two-dimensional SPH simulations of wedge water entries , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[9]  H. Wagner Über Stoß- und Gleitvorgänge an der Oberfläche von Flüssigkeiten , 1932 .

[10]  J. T. Tuitman,et al.  Hydro-elastic response of ship structures to slamming induced whipping , 2010 .

[11]  Joachim L. Grenestedt,et al.  Some analytical results for the initial phase of bottom slamming , 2013 .

[12]  Davis,et al.  Wave slamming loads on wave-piercer catamarans operating at high-speed determined by hydro-elastic segmented model experiments , 2013 .

[13]  Odd M. Faltinsen Water entry of a wedge by hydroelastic orthotropic plate theory , 1999 .

[14]  Alexander Korobkin,et al.  Three-dimensional theory of water impact. Part 1. Inverse Wagner problem , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Serge Abrate,et al.  Hydroelasticity in water-entry problems: Comparison between experimental and SPH results , 2012 .

[16]  Cetin Morris Sonsino,et al.  Fatigue assessment of welded joints by local approaches Second edition , 2007 .

[17]  José R. Marín,et al.  Fatigue Analysis of the Structural Bottom of an Aluminum Planing Craft through Vibratory Load of the Propeller System , 2015 .

[18]  W. Chu,et al.  FATIGUE UNDER CYCLIC COMPRESSIVE LOAD , 1984 .

[19]  Nitai Drimer,et al.  A design method for planing hulls, considering hydro-elasticity and nonlinear dynamic structural response , 2017 .

[20]  Yoshimi Goda,et al.  Random Seas and Design of Maritime Structures , 1985 .