Can board environmental orientation improve U.S. firms' carbon performance? The mediating role of carbon strategy

Overwhelming evidence from prior research suggests a positive association between corporate board characteristics and carbon performance; however, very little is known about the mechanisms linking the two variables. This study attempts to fill this gap by developing and empirically testing a conceptual model that highlights the role of carbon strategy in the relationship between board environmental orientation (BEO) and carbon performance. We argue that BEO can directly and indirectly influence carbon performance through carbon strategy. Using structural equation modelling to analyse data consisting of 2,301 US firm-year observations over the 2005-2015 period, we find that the greater the BEO is, the better its carbon performance (i.e., lower greenhouse gas emissions). The results also provide evidence of the mediating effect of carbon strategy on the relationship between BEO and carbon performance. Splitting the sample into high and low carbon-intensive industries shows a partial mediation effect in high carbon-intensive industries and a full mediation effect in low carbon-intensive industries. The findings of the study and its implications for scholars, policy makers, managers, investors and environmentalists are discussed.

[1]  F. Ullah,et al.  Environmental Policy, Environmental Performance, and Financial Distress in China: Do Top Management Team Characteristics Matter? , 2018, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[2]  B. Jaggi,et al.  The Factors Motivating Voluntary Disclosure of Carbon Information: Evidence Based on Italian Listed Companies , 2018 .

[3]  Akrum Helfaya,et al.  Do Board’s Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence , 2017 .

[4]  H. Latan,et al.  Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: Mediation role of environmental management accounting , 2017 .

[5]  Collins G. Ntim,et al.  Environmental Policy, Sustainable Development, Governance Mechanisms and Environmental Performance , 2017 .

[6]  P. Letmathe,et al.  Eco-efficiency: GHG reduction related environmental and economic performance. The case of the companies participating in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme , 2017 .

[7]  Diogenis Baboukardos.  Market valuation of greenhouse gas emissions under a mandatory reporting regime: Evidence from the UK , 2017 .

[8]  J. Galbreath.  The Impact of Board Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Temporal View , 2017 .

[9]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  The Role of Board Environmental Committees in Corporate Environmental Performance , 2017 .

[10]  Faizul Haque.  The Effects of Board Characteristics and Sustainable Compensation Policy on Carbon Performance of UK Firms , 2017 .

[11]  A. Cook,et al.  Do Women Leaders Promote Sustainability? Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Governance Composition on Environmental Performance , 2016 .

[12]  S. Elbanna,et al.  Investigating relationships between stakeholders’ pressure, eco-control systems and hotel performance , 2016 .

[13]  Katrin Hummel,et al.  The Relationship between Sustainability Performance and Sustainability Disclosure – Reconciling Voluntary Disclosure Theory and Legitimacy Theory , 2016 .

[14]  G. Trojanowski,et al.  Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance , 2016 .

[15]  Marc Journeault,et al.  The Influence of the Eco-Control Package on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Natural Resource-Based Approach , 2016 .

[16]  Subhash Abhayawansa,et al.  Determinants of carbon management strategy adoption: Evidence from Australia’s top 200 publicly listed firms , 2016 .

[17]  Qingliang Tang,et al.  Gender Diversity, Board Independence, Environmental Committee and Greenhouse Gas Disclosure , 2015 .

[18]  J. Aragón-Correa,et al.  Boards and Sustainability: the Contingent Influence of Director Interlocks on Corporate Environmental Performance , 2015 .

[19]  C. Post,et al.  From Board Composition to Corporate Environmental Performance Through Sustainability-Themed Alliances , 2015 .

[20]  G. Vesty,et al.  Creating numbers: carbon and capital investment , 2015 .

[21]  Yong-Yeon Ji.  Top Management Team Pay Structure and Corporate Social Performance , 2015 .

[22]  Qingliang Tang,et al.  Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance , 2014 .

[23]  Ella Mae Matsumura,et al.  Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures , 2014 .

[24]  Qingliang Tang,et al.  Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries: A resource constraint perspective , 2013 .

[25]  M. Delmas,et al.  Triangulating Environmental Performance: What Do Corporate Social Responsibility Ratings Really Capture? , 2013 .

[26]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[27]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link? , 2012 .

[28]  Qingliang Tang,et al.  Corporate Incentives to Disclose Carbon Information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 Report , 2012 .

[29]  Michael P. Krzus,et al.  Market Interest in Nonfinancial Information , 2011 .

[30]  Renée B. Adams,et al.  Women in the Boardroom: A Global Perspective? , 2011 .

[31]  Vic Naiker,et al.  The Effect of Board Characteristics on Firm Environmental Performance , 2011 .

[32]  H. Jo,et al.  Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2011 .

[33]  C. Post,et al.  Green Governance: Boards of Directors’ Composition and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility , 2011 .

[34]  Peter M. Clarkson,et al.  The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) , 2011 .

[35]  Giovanna Michelon,et al.  Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: an empirical investigation of the US Best Corporate Citizens , 2010 .

[36]  Charles H. Cho.  Legitimation Strategies Used in Response to Environmental Disaster: A French Case Study of Total SA's Erika and AZF Incidents , 2009 .

[37]  J. Galbreath.  Corporate governance practices that address climate change: an exploratory study , 2009 .

[38]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Environmental Performance and Executive Compensation: An Integrated Agency-Institutional Perspective , 2009 .

[39]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Affiliate Directors and Perceived Risk Bearing in Publicly Traded, Family–Controlled Firms: The Case of Diversification , 2008 .

[40]  Volker H. Hoffmann,et al.  Mitigating climate change – how do corporate strategies differ? , 2008 .

[41]  Charles H. Cho,et al.  The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note , 2007 .

[42]  Bruce A. Walters,et al.  The Impact of Board Composition and Top Management Team Ownership Structure on Post-IPO Performance in Young Entrepreneurial Firms , 2007 .

[43]  Katherine Campbell,et al.  Executive compensation and non-financial risk: An empirical examination , 2007 .

[44]  Juan Manuel de la Fuente-Sabaté,et al.  Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Reputation: Two Interwoven Perspectives , 2007 .

[45]  Peter M. Clarkson,et al.  Does it Really Pay to Be Green? Determinants and Consequences of Proactive Environmental Strategies , 2006 .

[46]  E. Webb,et al.  An Examination of Socially Responsible Firms' Board Structure , 2004 .

[47]  Mike W. Peng.  Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions , 2004 .

[48]  Iain J. Clelland,et al.  Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment , 2004 .

[49]  A. Hillman,et al.  Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives , 2003 .

[50]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data , 2003 .

[51]  George I. Kassinis,et al.  Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation , 2002 .

[52]  Ramona L. Paetzold,et al.  The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change , 2000 .

[53]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance , 1999 .

[54]  James D. Westphal.  Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties , 1999 .

[55]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Strategists on the Board , 1999 .

[56]  J. Aragón-Correa.  RESEARCH NOTES. STRATEGIC PROACTIVITY AND FIRM APPROACH TO THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT. , 1998 .

[57]  J. Aragón-Correa.  Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment , 1998 .

[58]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  Internationalization and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure , 1998 .

[59]  S. Hart,et al.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[60]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[61]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  Corporate Divestiture Intensity in Restructuring Firms: Effects of Governance, Strategy, and Performance , 1994 .

[62]  Kimberly D. Elsbach.  MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMACY IN THE CALIFORNIA CATTLE INDUSTRY - THE CONSTRUCTION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF VERBAL ACCOUNTS , 1994 .

[63]  H. Dudley Dewhirst,et al.  Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation , 1992 .

[64]  W. Boeker,et al.  Organizational performance and adaptation: effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[65]  Kenneth J. Martin,et al.  Executive compensation and executive incentive problems: an empirical analysis , 1987 .

[66]  Judith Gurney.  BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[67]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[68]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[69]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[70]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[71]  J. Pfeffer.  Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment , 1972 .

[72]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models , 2012 .

[73]  Lucie K. Ozanne,et al.  The Interactive Effect of Internal and External Factors on a Proactive Environmental Strategy and its Influence on a Firm's Performance , 2010 .

[74]  Peter M. Clarkson,et al.  An examination of environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance , 2007 .

[75]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy , 2003 .

[76]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.